Teacher Development: De facto Teacher Leaders for English Language Learners

Authors

  • Holly Hansen-Thomas
  • Karen Dunlap
  • Pat J. Casey
  • Teresa Starrett

Keywords:

teachers; English Language Learners; professional development

Abstract

This qualitative study highlighted the redefinition of roles played by
secondary-level, mainstream content-area teachers involved in an English as a
Second Language (ESL) professional development (PD) program. The researchers
examined how the practice of becoming an emerging leader in ESL, a new discipline
for many teachers, was impacted by participation in an intensive 18 month ESL PD
program. Specifically, this case study focused on the participants‘ ability to translate
newly acquired multicultural competence, second language acquisition, and ESL
teaching strategies into training sessions for their content-area colleagues. The
reflective statements from teacher participants following the delivery of what is
termed 'turnaround training‘ revealed that the teachers experienced changes in
professional self-concept both as teacher leaders and as advocates for English
Language Learners (ELLs). This shift of teacher as leader benefits both teacher and
student, according to Barth (2011) as teacher leaders experience less isolation, have
more professional satisfaction for improving their schools and increased reflection
about their practice. This work found that through PD, teachers‘ roles shifted from
not just content expert but also to ELL expert and, indeed, advocate of ESL students.

References

Ballantyne, K.G., Sanderman, A.R., Levy, J. (2008). Educating English language learners: Building teacher capacity. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English

Language Acquisition. Available http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/practice/mainstream_teachers.htm.

Barth, R. (2011). Teacher leader. In E. Hilty (Ed.), Teacher leadership: The “new†foundations

of teacher education. (22-33). New York: Lang Publishing.

Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change:

Implementing and sustaining innovation. (Vol. 8). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

Bernard, M., & Walton, K. (2011). The effect of You Can Do It! Education in six schools on student perceptions of wellbeing, teaching, learning and relationships. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 5(1), 22-37.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon Publishers.

Callahan, R. (2005, Summer). Tracking and High School English Learners: Limiting Opportunity to Learn. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2), pp. 305-328.

Carey, M. A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning implementing and interpreting focus group research. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225-251). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chappell, C. (1995). Issues of teacher identity in a restructuring VET system. Sydney:

UTS Research Centre Vocational Education & Training. http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Journals_and_Publications/Journals/Educational_Researcher/Volume_33_No_8/02_ERv33n8_Borko.pdf

Cohen, J. L. (2008). That’s not treating you as a professional: teachers constructing complex professional identities through talk. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 14(2), 79-93.

Fenner, D.S. (2013) Advocating for English learners: A guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. Toronto: OISE Press.

Gándara, P., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Driscoll, A. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Berkeley, CA.: Joint Publications. Retrieved from http://escholarshiporg/uc/item/6430628z

Gomez, M. L., & White, E. (2009). Seeing one another as “otherâ€. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2010), 1015-1022.

Guskey, T. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.

Hansen-Thomas, H., Casey, P. & Grosso, L. (2012). Multiplying the Effect of Professional

Development: Teachers Training Teachers. TESOL Journal, 4(1)129-150. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesj.2013.4.issue-1/issuetoc

Harper, C. A., & de Jong, E. J. (2009). English language teacher expertise: The elephant in the room. Language and Education, 23(2), 127-151.

Harper, C., & Platt, E. (1998). Full inclusion of secondary ESL students: Some concerns from Florida. TESOL Journal, 7(5), 30-36.

Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through staff development. New York, NY: Longman Press.

Kamberlis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics and inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. (887-914). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (2011) Understanding teacher leadership. In E. Hilty (Ed.),

Teacher leadership: The “new†foundations of teacher education. (5-21). New York: Lang Publishing.

Kennedy, M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4-12.

Lawal, R.A. (n.d.). I’ve not got a job sir; I’m only teaching: Dynamics of teacher identity in an era of globalization. University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/lkpzrm7

Lawrence, G. (1974). Patterns of effective inservice education: A state of the art summary of

research on materials and procedures for changing teacher behaviors in inservice education. Gainesville: University of Florida College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 176 424).

Lincoln, Y., & Guba E. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging

confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Harding, C., Arbuckle, M., Murray, L., Dubca, C., & Williams, M. (1987). Continuing to learn: A guidebook for teacher development. Andover, MA.: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands, and the National Staff Development Council.

Newman, K., Samimy, K., & Romstedt, K. (2010). Developing a training program for secondary teachers of English language learners in Ohio. Theory into Practice, 49(2), 152-161.

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.

Robertson, I. (2009, 15-16 April). TAFE teacher's knowledge bases: Analysis of the Diplomain

VET Practice. Paper presented at the AVETRA 12th Annual Conference. Aligning Participants, Policy and Pedagogy: Traction and Tensions in VET Research, Coogee, NSW.

Scanlan, M., & Lopez, F. (2012). Vamos! How school leaders provide equity and excellence for bilingual students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 483-625. Doi: 10.1177/0013161X11436270.

Simon, R.I. (1995) Face to face with alterity: Postmodern Jewish identity and the eros of pedagogy. In J. Gallop (ed.) Pedagogy: The Question of Impersonation (pp. 90–105). Bloomington, IA: University of Indiana Press.

Sparks, G. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 4(3), 65-72.

Sparks, D. & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40-57.

Tom, A. (1984). Inquiring into inquiry-oriented teacher education. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40-57.

Trent, J., & Lim, J. (2010). Teacher identity construction in school-university partnerships: Discourse and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2010), 1609-1618.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Winters, K. (1999). Teacher quality: Report on teacher preparation and qualifications. EDInfo Online. Retrieved from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=1999080

Wolcott, H. F. (2009). Writing up qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wood, F., & Kleine, P. (1987). Staff development research and rural schools: A critical appraisal. Unpublished paper. University of Oklahoma, Norman.

Wu, P. (1987). Teachers as staff developers: Research opinions, and cautions. Journal of Staff Development, 8(1), 4-6.

Yarger, S., Howey, K., & Joyce, B. (1980). Inservice teacher education. Palo Alto, CA: Booksend Laboratory.

Yoon, B. (2008). Uninvited guests: The influence of teachers' roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American

Educational Research Journal. 45(2), 495-522. doi: 0.3102/0002831208316200.

Zembylas, M. (2003). Interrogating "teacher identity": Emotion, resistance, and self-formation. Educational Theory, 53(1), 107-127.

Zurcher, L. (1983). Social roles: conformity, conflict and creativity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-30

How to Cite

Hansen-Thomas, H. ., Dunlap, K. ., Casey, P. J. ., & Starrett, T. . (2014). Teacher Development: De facto Teacher Leaders for English Language Learners. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 5(1), 35–47. Retrieved from http://www.ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/1191

Issue

Section

Articles