Dynamics of Changes in Teachers’ Perceptions of STEM Coding Robotics: The Importance of a Teacher Professional Development Program
Keywords:
coding robotics; STEM; teachers’ perception; teachers’ programAbstract
This study aimed to determine significant changes in teachers’ perceptions of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) activities (e.g., coding robotics). Although teachers’ perceptions are important in integrating STEM in education, there is still limited understanding of teachers’ perceptions regarding the integration of STEM education, particularly in teaching coding robotics. This study employed a pre-experimental design with a one-group pre-test and post?test. The research sample involved 41 teachers, ranging from elementary to high school level. Teachers’ perception data were analyzed using non-parametric chi-square and the paired samples t-test to assess the impact before and after participating in the training program, while teachers’ recommendations on implementing coding robotics were analyzed using descriptive thematic analysis. The results showed that the STEM coding robotics training program significantly changed teachers’ perceptions of mastering coding robotics skills (p < .001; t = -6.781). The training also significantly changed teachers’ perceptions of coding robotics implemented at elementary school level (p = .001; t = -3.591) and junior high school level (p = .005; t = -2.987), but no significant change in perception was found for senior high school teachers (p = .103; t = -1.672). Other detailed findings that were elaborated in this empirical paper include the association between teachers’ perceptions of coding robotics and their recommendations for implementing coding robotics after attending the program. These findings underscore the value of targeted professional development in fostering teachers’ readiness for 21st?century STEM instruction and advancing Sustainable Development Goals in education.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.30
References
Abakah, E. (2023). Teacher learning from continuing professional development (CPD) participation: A sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100242
Aksu, F. N., & Durak, G. (2019). Robotics in education: Examining information technology teachers’ views. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 6(4), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2019.64.162.168
Ali, N., Santos, I. M., Alhakmani, R., Khurma, O. A., Khine, M. S., & Kassem, U. (2023). Exploring technology acceptance: Teachers’ perspectives on robotics in teaching and learning in the UAE. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), 469. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13646
Alsalamat, M. K. M. (2024). Secondary stage science teachers’ perceptions toward STEM education in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 16(9), 3634.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ su16093634
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223
Bell, D. (2016). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9
Bowman, M. A., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Jiang, Z., & Xie, K. (2020). Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 188–204.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1830895
Budiyanto, C. W., Fenyvesi, K., Lathifah, A., & Yuana, R. A. (2022). Computational thinking development: Benefiting from educational robotics in STEM teaching. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 1997–2012.
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.1997
Castro, A., Medina, J., Aguilera, C. A., Ramirez, M., & Aguilera, C. (2023). Robotics education in STEM units: Breaking down barriers in rural multigrade schools. Sensors, 23(1), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010387
Castro, E., Cecchi, F., Salvini, P., Valente, M., Buselli, E., Menichetti, L., Calvani, A., & Dario, P. (2018). Design and impact of a teacher training course, and attitude change concerning educational robotics. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0475-6
Chai, C. S. (2019). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0400-7
Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., & Mondada, F. (2016). How do teachers perceive educational robots in formal education? A study based on the Thymio robot*. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 23(2), 16–23.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2535080
Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G. J., Rong, M., Chen, A., & Liang, J. C. (2023). Trends and research foci of robotics?based STEM education: A systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology?based learning model. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3
De Jager, T. (2023). How can educators effectively be trained to teach coding and robotics in STEAM field programs? Jurnal VARIDIKA, 35(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v1i1.20840
Drakatos, N., & Christou, A. (2023). The teaching of robotics to prospective teachers and its application in the classroom. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(1), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.1.1332
Elmosaad, Y. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of their influence on student practices to enhance the school environment: A cross-sectional study in governmental general education schools in Al-Ahsa Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Cureus, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51702
Feldman-Maggor, Y., Tuvi-Arad, I., & Blonder, R. (2022). Development and evaluation of an online course on nanotechnology for the professional development of chemistry teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 44(16), 2465–2484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2128930
Feri, A., & Zulherman. (2021). Development of nearpod-based e module on science material “energy and its changes” to improve elementary school student learning achievement. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i2.400
Filippov, S. A., Ten, N. G., & Fradkov, A. L. (2017). Teaching robotics in secondary school: Examples and outcomes. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 12167–12172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2147
García-Carrillo, C., Greca, I. M., & Fernández-Hawrylak, M. (2021). Teacher perspectives on teaching the stem approach to educational coding and robotics in primary education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020064
Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Investigating perceptions of primary and preschool educators regarding incorporation of educational robotics into STEM education. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 5(1), 24003.
https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/14384
Glezou, K. V. (2021). Robotics as a powerful vehicle toward learning and computational thinking in secondary education of 21st century. In: Research Anthology on Computational Thinking, Programming, and Robotics in the Classroom. IGI Global. pp. 716-755. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6717-3.ch001
Gonzales, M., Andal, E., Ching, D., Gaffud, M., & Tabo, E. (2021). Assessing the efficacy of RoboTeach extension project on public school teachers. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(3), 78–100.
https://doi.org/10.53378/348742
Gunadi, G., Haryono, H., & Purwanti, E. (2022). The analysis of 21st century learning implementation and competency achievement of junior high school students in 3T regions. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 11(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcet.v11i1.44847
Hallström, J., & De Vries, M. J. (2024). Programming and computational thinking in technology education (Vol. 20). Brill Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004687912
Hasanah, U. (2024). Gaining science teachers’ perceptions toward STEM education in Indonesia. In Proceedings of 2nd 2024 Education, Science, and Technology International Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 278-296).
http://103.97.100.158/index.php/edusciencetech/article/view/607
Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., Brugha, M., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080
Huang, B., Jong, M. S.-Y., Tu, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., Chai, C. S., & Jiang, M. Y.-C. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 189, 104577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577
Hughes, C. E., Dieker, L. A., Glavey, E. M., Hines, R. A., Wilkins, I., Ingraham, K., Bukaty, C.A., Ali, K., Shah, S., Murphy, J., & Taylor, M. S. (2022). RAISE: Robotics & AI to improve STEM and social skills for elementary school students. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 968312. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.968312
Hursen, C., Pa?a, D., & Keser, H. (2023). High school students’ use of information, media, and technology skills and multidimensional 21st-century skills: An investigation within the context of students, teachers, and curricula. Sustainability, 15(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612214
Ibrahim, M. F., Huddin, A. B., Hashim, F. H., Abdullah, M., Abd Rahni, A. A., Mustaza, S. M., Hussain, A., & Zaman, M. H. M. (2020). Strengthening programming skills among engineering students through experiential learning based robotics project. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 939–946.
https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20653
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Substantial capabilities of robotics in enhancing industry 4.0 implementation. Cognitive Robotics, 1, 58–75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2021.06.001
Jones, M., Geiger, V., Falloon, G., Fraser, S., Beswick, K., Holland-Twining, B., & Hatisaru, V. (2024). Learning contexts and visions for STEM in schools. International Journal of Science Education, 47(3), 337–357.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2323032
Jung, S. E., & Won, E.-S. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905
Kayg?s?z, G. M., Üzümcü, Ö., & Ucar, F. M. (2020). The case of prospective teachers’ integration of coding-robotics practices into science teaching with STEM approach. ?lkö?retim Online, 19(3), 1200–1213.
https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.728020
Khanlari, A. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and the challenges of integrating educational robots into primary/elementary curricula. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(3), 320–330.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1056106
Khwaengmek, V., & Faikhamta, C. (2023). Perceptions of pre-service science teachers toward teaching STEM from suburb university in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(1), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.1.25
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.005
Kurup, P. M., Li, X., Powell, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Building future primary teachers’ capacity in STEM: Based on a platform of beliefs, understandings and intentions. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0164-5
Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101002.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002
Li, Z., Yan, Z., Chan, K. K. Y., Zhan, Y., & Guo, W. Y. (2023). The role of a professional development program in improving primary teachers’ formative assessment literacy. Teacher Development, 27(4), 447–467.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2023.2223595
Mallik, A., Liu, D., & Kapila, V. (2023). Analyzing the outcomes of a robotics workshop on the self-efficacy, familiarity, and content knowledge of participants and examining their designs for end-of-year robotics contests. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7225–7264.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11400-1
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Mason, S. L., & Rich, P. J. (2020). Development and analysis of the elementary student coding attitudes survey. Computers & Education, 153, 103898.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103898
McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479
Meral, M., Yalç?n, S. A., Çak?r, Z., & Samur, E. (2024). The effect of STEM-based robotic coding education on primary school students’ decision-making skills. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 17(2), 478–498.
https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1355818
Miller, J. (2019). STEM education in the primary years to support mathematical thinking: Using coding to identify mathematical structures and patterns. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(6), 915–927.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01096-y
Mu, S., Xu, K., He, W., Hu, X., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Teaching behaviors in problem-oriented instruction for robotics education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 17943–17964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12578-2
Mumcu, F., Uslu, N. A., & Y?ld?z, B. (2022). Investigating teachers’ expectations from a professional development program for integrated STEM education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213543
Mury, S. R., Negrini, L., Assaf, D., & Skweres, M. (2022). How to support teachers to carry out educational robotics activities in school? The case of Roteco, the Swiss robotic teacher community. Frontiers in Education, 7.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.968675
Mwangi, P. N., Muriithi, C. M., & Agufana, P. B. (2022). Exploring the benefits of educational robots in STEM learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 11(6), 5–11.
https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.f3646.0811622
Negrini, L., Giang, C., Bonaiuti, G., Cascalho, J. M., Primo, T. T., & Eteokleous, N. (2023). Editorial: Educational robotics as a tool to foster 21st century skills. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1186029
Ortega-Ruipérez, B., & Alcalde, M. L. (2023). Teachers’ perception about the difficulty and use of programming and robotics in the classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7074–7085. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2061007
Ou, Q., Liang, W., He, Z., Liu, X., Yang, R., & Wu, X. (2023). Investigation and analysis of the current situation of programming education in primary and secondary schools. Heliyon, 9(4), e15530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15530
Ouyang, F., & Xu, W. (2024). The effects of educational robotics in STEM education: A multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00469-4
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Gözüm, A. ?. C. (2022). Editorial: STEM, STEAM, computational thinking, and coding: Evidence-based research and practice in children’s development. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1110476
Paucar-Curasma, R., Cerna-Ruiz, L. P., Acra-Despradel, C., Villalba-Condori, K. O., Massa-Palacios, L. A., Olivera-Chura, A., & Esteban-Robladillo, I. (2023). Development of computational thinking through STEM activities for the promotion of gender equality. Sustainability, 15(16), 12335.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612335
Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444–467.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1356671
?ahin, E., Sar?, U., & ?en, Ö. F. (2024). STEM professional development program for gifted education teachers: STEM lesson plan design competence, self-efficacy, computational thinking and entrepreneurial skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101439
Samara, V., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). The use of new technologies and robotics (STEM) in the teaching of sciences in primary education: The concept of magnetism: A bibliographic review. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(2).
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i2.4652
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez-Scherer, B. (2021). Some evidence on the cognitive benefits of learning to code. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.559424
Seckin-Kapucu, M. (2023). Studies on robotic coding education in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 9(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.1239093
Silva, R., Costa, C., & Martins, F. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions towards integrating educational robotics in the primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), Article em2419.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14356
Surahman, E., & Wang, T.-H. (2023). In-service STEM teachers professional development programmes: A systematic literature review 2018–2022. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104326
Teidla-Kunitsõn, G., Sisask, M., & Põlda, H. (2023). A bridge or a wall: Teachers mediating ICT in the classroom. Education Sciences, 13(10), 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100979
Tiryaki, A., & Ad?güzel, S. (2021). The effect of STEM-based robotic applications on the creativity and attitude of students. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 288–297.
https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3.29683
Tran, Y. (2018). Computer programming effects in elementary: Perceptions and career aspirations in STEM. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(2), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9358-z
Tuomi, P., Multisilta, J., Saarikoski, P., & Suominen, J. (2018). Coding skills as a success factor for a society. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 419–434.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9611-4
Ufnar, J. A., & Shepherd, V. L. (2019). The scientist in the classroom partnership program: An innovative teacher professional development model. Professional Development in Education, 45(4), 642–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1474487
U?ur-Erdo?mu?, F. (2021). How do elementary childhood education teachers perceive robotic education in kindergarten? A qualitative study. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.17275/PER.21.47.8.2
Uslu, N. A., Yavuz, G. O., & Usluel, Y. K. (2022). A systematic review study on educational robotics and robots. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5874–5898.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2023890
Wahono, B., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Assesing teacher’s attitude, knowledge, and application (AKA) on STEM: An effort to foster the sustainable develpment of STEM education. Sustainability, 11(4), 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040950
Wahono, B., Hariyadi, S., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2022). The development of an online STEM teacher professional development package with the DECODE model: An innovative teacher’s quality maintenance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), Article em2191.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12647
Wahono, B., Hariyadi, S., Subiantoro, A. W., Bravo, J. A. M., & Manalu, M. S. (2025a). Empowering STEM teachers with TPACK: Insights from the DECODE online professional development program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), Article em2570.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15896
Wahono, B., Purmanna, A., Ramadhani, R., & Manalu, M. S. (2025b). Strengthens the student collaboration and decision-making skills through integrated STEM education: A research and development study. Science Education International, 36(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v36.i1.9
Wang, K., Sang, G. Y., Huang, L. Z., Li, S. H., & Guo, J. W. (2023). The effectiveness of educational robots in improving learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Sustainability, 15(5), 4637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054637
Yang, Y. F., Tseng, C. C., & Lai, S. C. (2024). Enhancing teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in AI-based technology integration into English speaking teaching through a professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 144, 104582.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104582
Yildirim, B., Akcan, A. T., & Ocal, E. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions and STEM teaching activities: Online teacher professional development. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.84
Yuldashevna, I. A., & Khurana, K. (2024). The impediments to the process of implementing robotics in the school education system in Uzbekistan. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241254595
Zhang, J., Zhou, M., & Zhang, X. (2023). Interventions to promote teachers’ perceptions about STEM education: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7355–7390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11492-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Astrino Purmanna, Suratno Suratno , Rif'ati Dina Handayani, Bevo Wahono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
