University of Applied Sciences Students’ Engagement with Scientific Literature for Final Year Projects: An Exploratory Study
Keywords:
Final Year Project (FYP); scientific inquiry; student research; scientific literature reviewAbstract
Students at universities of applied sciences (UAS) tend to overlook the importance of using scientific literature in their final year projects (FYP), which could affect the quality of their research. This paper explores how UAS students use scientific publications and theories/research frameworks for empirical research in their FYPs. Data were collected from 1) questionnaire completed by 31 final-year and recently graduated students, and 31 academic supervisors and Research Methods teachers, and 2) evaluation of 18 FYPs in an international UAS in the Netherlands. The samples were randomly selected from the university’s formal database (i.e., sampling frame). The analysis of the data led to the discovery of some key factors, such as lack of knowledge in selecting literature, inability to conduct an effective literature review and inability to develop a suitable conceptual/theoretical framework, which hindered the engagement of UAS students with scientific literature. Students’ lack of knowledge in conducting a literature review limited the quality of their final year projects and they need specialized workshops to develop their skills in literature research and critical analysis.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.9.17
References
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2018). What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 83-110.
American Public University System. (n.d.). iRubric: PADM Lit Review/Theoretical Framework Rubric. American Public University System.
Badenhorst, C. (2018). Citation practices of postgraduate students writing literature reviews. London Review of Education.
Berman, E. A. (2017). An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Researchers' Data Management Practices at UVM: Integrated Findings to Develop Research Data Services. Journal of eScience Librarianshp, 6(1).
Bologna Working Group. (2005). A Framework for Qualificaitons of the European Higher Education Area. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
Bootes, D. N., & Bailey, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Carracedo, F., Vilaró, J., González, J., Casas, P., Almiñana, J., Zaragoza, J., . . . Samsó, M. (2018). A proposal to develop and assess professional skills in engineering final year projects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 400-413.
Chen, D.-T., Wang, Y.-M., & Lee, W. (2016). Challenges confronting beginning researchers in conducting literature reviews. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(1), 47-60.
Chen, H. L., Chen, W. T., & Lin, Y. L. (2016). Earned value project management: Improving the predictive power of planned value. International Journal of Project Management, 22-29.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1).
Cuozzo, B., Dumay, J., Palmaccio, M., & Lombardi, R. (2017). Intellectual capital disclosure: a structured literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
Fisch, C., & Block, J. (2018). Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, 68(2018), 103-106.
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2015). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating A Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your "House". Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
Illing, J. (2014). 2014. In W. Blackwell (Ed.), Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice (pp. 331-347). The Association for the Study of Medical.
Izadinia, M. (2014). Authorship: The hidden voices of postgraduate TEFL students in Iran. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(4), 317-331.
Jawitz, J., Shay, S., & Moore, R. (2002). Management and assessment of final year projects in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 472-478.
Juntunen, M., & Lehenkari, M. (2021). A narrative literature review process for an academic business research thesis. Studies in higher education, 330-342.
Komba, S. C. (2015). The perceived importance of communication skills course among university students: the case of two universities in Tanzania. African Journal of Teacher Education.
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasi-Rodriguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16((2020)), 1023-1042.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Springer.
Malechwanzi, J. M., Lei, H., & Wang, L. (2016). Students' Perceptions and Faculty Measured Competencies in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 56-69.
Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International journal of project management, 446-457.
Norton, R. E. (2019). Herder's aesthetics and the European Enlightenment. Cornell University Press.
Paul, J., & Criado, A. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.
Quinlan, C. (2011). Business Research Methods (1st ed.). Hampshire: Southwestern Cengage Learning.
Randolph, J. J. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13).
Ravitch, S. M., & Riggan, M. (2017). Reason & rigor: How theoretical frameworks guide.
Roberts-Holmes, G. (2018). Doing your early years research project: A step by step guide. Sage.
Saunders, M. N., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Doing research in business & management: An essential guide to planning your project. Pearson.
Shahsavar, Z., & Kourepaz, H. (2020). Postgraduate students' difficulties in writing their theses literature review. Cogent Education, 7(1).
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 333-339.
Sodhar, I., Noor, D., Memon, I., & Malik, M. (2020). A survey of faced issues and challenges of undergraduate students in final year project. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 649-654.
Vereniging Hogescholen (Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences). (2019). The Professional Master Standard. Copenhagen: Vereniging Hogescholen.
Walter, L., & Stouck, J. (2020). Writing the Literature Review: Graduate Student Experiences. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1).
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Abdul Rauf, Hanna Rahma Abdelwahab, Dadi Chen, Peter Birdsall
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
