Enhancing Reflective Language Learning Through Digital Tools: A Comparative Case Study in Kazakhstani Middle Schools
Keywords:
digital reflection; self-regulated learning; English language education; emotional literacy; KazakhstanAbstract
Digital tools are increasingly integrated into classrooms, yet their potential to support reflective learning remains underexplored, particularly in exam-driven and resource-constrained contexts. This mixed-methods comparative case study examined (1) whether structured digital reflection tools enhance middle school students’ confidence, metacognitive engagement, and emotional expressiveness compared to traditional journaling, and (2) how such tools influence teacher responsiveness and instructional adaptation. Participants were 50 Grade 7 students (aged 13–14) from two public middle school classrooms in Kentau, Kazakhstan. Over a three-week period, one group used Google Forms and Padlet, while the other completed pen-and-paper journals with identical prompts. Data included pre- and post-intervention surveys, 180 weekly reflections, and teacher interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed significantly greater confidence gains in the digital group, whose mean score rose from 3.12 to 4.01 on a 5-point scale (p = .002; d = 0.68). In addition, qualitative findings indicated higher rates of goal setting (58% vs. 29%) and richer use of emotional vocabulary (73% vs. 41%) in the digital group. Teachers reported that digital platforms provided real-time insights into students’ understanding and emotions, enabling more responsive and differentiated instruction. These results demonstrate the potential of low-cost digital tools to deepen learning, enhance student agency, and support adaptive teaching in under-resourced, exam-oriented education systems. While the study was limited to the three-week intervention in two classrooms, the findings suggest avenues for future research on the long-term impact of digital reflection across subjects and grade levels.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.22
References
Abildinova, G., Assainova, A. A., Karymsakova, A., Abykenova, D., & Temirkhanova,
M. (2024). Transforming high school education with digital tools:Systematic
review. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(8),
–694. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.8.34
Aydo?mu?, M., & Kurnaz, A. (2022). Investigating the effectiveness of reflective teaching
activities in secondary English classes. Athens Journal of Education, 9(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.9-3-8
Barrett, H. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The
REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436–449.
https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. In Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843-860). Springer, Singapore.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning.
Routledge.
Cheng, Y., Guan, R., Li, T., Rakovic, M., Li, X., Fan, Y., Jin, F., Tsai, Y., Gaševic, D., and
Swiecki, Z. (2025). Self-regulated Learning Processes in Secondary Education: A Network Analysis of Trace-based Measures. In LAK25: The 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK 2025), March 03–07, 2025, Dublin, Ireland. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706502
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the
educative process. D.C. Heath.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2023). Harnessing rationales to foster motivation: Meeting
learners’ needs. In S. Mercer & T. Kostoulas (Eds.), Language learning beyond English: A global perspective (pp. 135–150). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009388795
Farrell, T. S. C. (2022). Reflective practice in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009028783
Hung, D. M., & Thuy, P. T. (2021). Reflective teaching perceived and practiced by EFL
teachers - a case in the south of Vietnam. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14219a
Hussein, H. A. R. A., Jamal, D. A. H. A., & Sadi, I. (2020). Students’ reflective journals
and creative writing in EFL. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3484–
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080823
Karabassova, L. (2020). Understanding trilingual education reform in Kazakhstan: Why is
it stalled? In Education, equity, economy (pp. 37–51). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
-030-50127-3_3
Kheirzadeh, S., & Sistani, N. (2018). The effect of reflective teaching on Iranian EFL
students’ achievement: The case of teaching experience and level of education.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 43(2), 143–156.
https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.436675072442638
Khezrlou, S. (2021). Learners’ reflective practice between the repeated performances of
tasks: Effects on second language development. Dutch Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 10. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal9458
Kim, D., Park, H., & Vorobel, O. (2023). Enriching middle school students’ learning
through Digital Storytelling: a multimodal analytical framework. ECNU Review of Education, 7(2), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231182159
Kirk, G., & Pitches, A. (2013). Digital reflection: Using digital technologies to
enhance and embed reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 14(5), 700–713.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2014). Experiential learning
C.Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 42–68). SAGE Publications.
Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to
enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching, 11(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337093
Leinonen, T., Keune, A., Veermans, M., & Toikkanen, T. (2014). Mobile apps for
reflection in learning: Design research in K?12 education. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 47(1), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12224
Liu, K. (2017). Creating a dialogic space for prospective teacher critical reflection and
transformative learning. Reflective Practice, 18(6), 805–820.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1361919
Lu?trea, A., Dinc?, M., Berge, T., Oni?iu, A., Thomassen, M., Cra?ovan, M., & Luche?, D.
(2024). The digital reflective journal: A self-assessment tool for higher
education students. In Lecture notes in educational technology (pp. 259–283).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6136-4_12
Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2010). Helping students learn effective problem-solving strategies
by reflecting with peers. American Journal of Physics, 78(7), 748–754. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3319652
Mälkki, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2011). From reflection to action? Barriers and bridges
between higher education teachers’ thoughts and actions. Studies in Higher
Education, 37(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.492500
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s
theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong
Education, 19(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293458
Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice.
RoutledgeFalmer.
Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice.
RoutledgeFalmer.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030: The future
we want. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Park, E. (2022). The reflectivity of EFL preservice teachers in microteaching practice.
International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 21(4), 186–204.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.4.11
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning
components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective
thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
Rudenko, Y., & Lee, S. J. Impacts of Reflective Tools on Novice EFL Teachers’ Self-efficacy
Beliefs in Developing Countries: a Kazakhstan Case Study. Academic Journal of International Education Research ISSN, 2694, 7803. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yekaterina-Rudenko/publication/362429713_Impacts_of_Reflective_Tools_on_Novice_EFL_Teachers'_Self-_efficacy_Beliefs_in_Developing_Countries_a_Kazakhstan_Case_Study/links/67c0311896e7fb48b9d0b515/Impacts-of-Reflective-Tools-on-Novice-EFL-Teachers-Self-efficacy-Beliefs-in-Developing-Countries-a-Kazakhstan-Case-Study.pdf
Sarmurzin, Y., Amanzhol, N., Toleubayeva, K., Zhunusova, M., Amanova, A., & Abiyr,
(2023). Challenging aspects of Kazakhstan’s trilingual education policy:
evidence from a literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09823-7
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-
reflective practice. Guilford Press.
Sudirman, A., Gemilang, A. V., & Kristanto, T. M. A. (2021). Harnessing the power of
reflective journal writing in global contexts: A systematic literature review.
International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(12), 174–194.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.12.11
Sudirman, A., Gemilang, A. V., Kristanto, T. M. A., Robiasih, R. H., Hikmah, I.,
Nugroho, A. D., Karjono, J. C. S., Lestari, T., Widyarini, T. L., &
Prastanti, A. D. (2024). Reinforcing reflective practice through reflective
writing in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of
Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.5.24
Tafazoli, D. (2024). Exploring the potential of generative AI in democratizing English
language education. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100275.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100275
Tajik, A. (2025). Exploring the role of AI-Driven dynamic writing platforms in improving
EFL learners’ writing skills and fostering their motivation. Research Square
(Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5788599/v1
Tleuov, A. & KIMEP University. (2025). Teaching Speaking in Kazakhstani EFL
Classrooms: Negotiating teacher beliefs and assessment constraints. In IAFOR Journal of Education: Language Learning in Education (Vol. 13, Issue 1, p. 11). https://iafor.org/archives/journals/iafor-journal-of-education/10.22492.ije.13.1.01.pdf
Tosh, D., Light, T. P., Fleming, K., & Haywood, J. (2005). Engagement with Electronic
a. Portfolios: Challenges from the Student Perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning
and Technology, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/t23w31
Yelubayeva, P., Khamidova, A., Berkinbayeva, G., & Avakoval, R. (2025). Addressing
language education challenges in Kazakhstan for sustainable development.
European Journal of Language Policy, 17(1), 65–96.
https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2025.5
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Wang, C., & Pape, S. J. (2007). A probe into three Chinese boys’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs learning English as a second language. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540709594601
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gulnur Kadyrova, Meruert Serik, Zhannur Issina, Kyrmyzy Yessenova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
