Transforming an Online Advanced Diploma Molecular Biology Module: A student engagement case study
Keywords:
Transform; Student engagement; collaboration; online engagement framework; social constructivism theoryAbstract
This case study explored the transformation of the online Advanced Diploma Molecular Biology Module to enhance student engagement. Student engagement refers to the active participation of students in their learning process, which is influenced by their activities and a conducive environment established by educational institutions. The study aimed to determine various strategies and interventions for improving student engagement in online learning of molecular biology through an engagement framework. A literature review and document analysis were conducted to address the research questions guiding this study. The analysis of Learning Units 1 and 2 of the Molecular Biology modules revealed that there are limited student engagement activities, teacher/student relations, and peer interactions. The findings indicate the need for interactive content, regular feedback, active learning components, and community-building efforts to contribute to a supportive and motivating learning experience. The findings also suggest that a multifaceted approach, leveraging both technological tools and innovative pedagogical strategies, can effectively boost student engagement and academic performance in online courses. This case study highlights the potential of innovative educational methods to improve online learning environments and promote a more engaging and successful learning experience. Future research ought to investigate the impacts of these strategies on student achievement and retention.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.23
References
Abla, C., & Fraumeni, B. R. (2019). Student engagement: Evidence-based strategies to boost academic and social-emotional results. McREL International. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED600576.pdf
Agyeman, M. O., Cui, H., & Bennett, S. (2020). A Problem-Based Learning Technique to Improve Student Engagement in Multidisciplinary Groups in Higher Education. In V. Babi? & Z. Nedelko (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Enhancing Innovation in Higher Education Institutions (pp. 545-565). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2708-5.ch023
Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M.R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
Arifin, S.R.M. (2018). Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Study. International Journal of Care Scholars,1(12), 30-33. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijcs.v1i2.82
Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. 2020. Facilitating Student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Education Technology, 36 (4), 126-150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
Baig, M.I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: a systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 20-61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
Bhat, R. A. (2023). The Impact of Technology Integration on Student Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Social Science Educational Economics Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET) 2(9), 592-596.
a. 10.54443/ijset. v2i9.218
Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Denessen, E., Aelterman, N., & Aerens, L. (2021). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: an observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education, 36 (6), 754- 779. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184
Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology,11(100),1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
D’Angelo, C. (2018). In Power, R. (Ed). Technology and the curriculum: Summer 2018. https://pressbooks.pub/techandcurriculum/chapter/engagement-and- success/
Das, U. (2023). Online Learning: Challenges and Solutions for Learners and Teachers. Management and Labour Studies, 48(2), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X211069501
Donham, C., Pohan, C., Menke, E., & Kranzfelder, P. (2022). Increasing Student Engagement through Course Attributes, Community, and Classroom Technology: Lessons from the Pandemic. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00268-21
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. Sage Open, 4(1),1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
Fang, C., & Tse, A.W.C. (2023). Case Study: Postgraduate Students’ Class Engagement in various Online Learning Contexts When Taking Privacy Issues to Incorporate with Artificial Intelligence Applications. International Journal of Learning and Teaching,9(2),90-95. https://www.ijlt.org/uploadfile/2023/IJLT-V9N2-90.pdf
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(25), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P. & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations. Societies, 10 (86), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Getenet, S., & Tualaulelei, E. (2023). Using interactive technologies to enhance student engagement in higher education online learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 220-234.https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2244597
García, E.B.B., Rueda, H.S.Y., Rosales, J.C.M. (2025). Learning Natural Science Through Interactive Resources. In: Rocha, A., Ferrás, C., Calvo, H. (eds) Information Technology and Systems. ICITS 2025. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1449. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93103-1_25
Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022). Engagement in Online
a. Learning: Student Attitudes and Behavior During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
Hutton, C., & Robson, J. (2019). Breaking barriers, building community: improving student engagement with preparation for studying online multidisciplinary science by distance learning-case study. Directions in the teaching of physical sciences, 14(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.3217
Kanapeckas Métris, K. L. (2020). Activities and assessment solutions for students in advanced molecular genetics and biochemistry to direct and engage with public communication in an online environment. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education,48, 439–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21389
Lasekan, O.A., Pachava, V., Godoy Pena, M.T., Golla, S.K., & Raje, M.S. (2024). Investigating Factors Influencing Students’ Engagement in Sustainable Online Education. Sustainability, 16, 689.https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020689
Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324-327.
a. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
Makri, C., & Neely, A. (2021). Grounded Theory: A Guide for Exploratory Studies in Management Research. International Journal of Qualitative Method, 20, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211013654
Mate, K., & Weidenhofer, J. (2021). Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences. FASEB BioAdvances, 4(1),9– 21. https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2021-00075
Mazzolini, A. P., Daniel, S., & Edwards, T. (2012). Using Interactive Lecture Demonstrations to Improve Conceptual Understanding of Resonance in an Electronics Course. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 18(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.7158/22054952.2012.11464066
Moonasamy, A. R., & Naidoo, G. M. (2022). Digital Learning: Challenges experienced by South African University students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 17(2),76-90. Retrieved March 18, 2024, from http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2519- 56702022000200005&lng=en&tlng=en.
Nguyen, T.A., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2016). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163–174.
a. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359
Oxford, J.T., & Jorcyk, C.L. (2020). Students engage in primary literature in molecular biology techniques using an online journal club format. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(6),675-677. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/bmb.21472.
Priya, A. (2021). Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and Navigating the Conundrums in Its Application. Sociology Bulletin, 70(1),94-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3, 369- 387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Rowan, L. M., & Jin, Y. (2022). Conversations that count in online student engagement – a Case Study. ASCILITE 2022 Conference Proceedings: Reconnecting relationships through technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2022.162
Ruado, L.F., & Cortez, L.A. Enhancing Student Engagement and Achievement in Biology through Interactive Slide Presentations. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet. v3i1.2520
Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How Motivation Influences Student Engagement: A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252-267. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
Saleem, M. S., Isha, A. S. N., Awan, M. I., Yusop, Y. B., & Naji, G. M. A. (2022). Fostering Academic Engagement in Post-graduate Students: Assessing the Role of Positive Emotions, Positive Psychology, and Stress. Frontiers in Psychology,13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920395
Sarvary, M. A., Castelli, F. R., & Asgari, M. (2022). Undergraduates' Experiences with Online and in- Person Courses Provide Opportunities for Improving Student- Centered Biology Laboratory Instruction. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Educaction 23(1),1-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00289-21
Sashank, Y.T., Kakulapati, V., & Bhutada, S. (2023). Student Engagement Prediction in Online Session. International Journal on Recent Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11 (2), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc. v11i2.6108
Seery, C., Andres, A., Moore-Cherry, N. et al. (2021) Students as Partners in Peer Mentoring: Expectations, Experiences and Emotions. Innovative Higher Education, 46, 663– 681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09556-8
Sibanda, T., & Josua, L.M. (2022). COVID-19 triggered technology integration strategies for enhanced student engagement in blended learning. African Journal of Education Practise, 8 (5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.1616
Singh, M., James, P.S., Paul, H., & Bolar, K. (2022). Impact of Cognitive-behavioral motivation on student engagement. Heliyon, 8:1-9.
a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon. 2022.e09843
Skinner, E. (2016). “Engagement and Disaffection as Central to Processes of Motivation Resilience and Development”. In Handbook of Motivation at School edited by K.R. Wentzel and D.B. Miele. Routledge Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773384 .
Stenalt, M. H., Sørensen, M. T., & Lindvig, K. E. (2025). Exploring student engagement in studies into higher education interdisciplinary learning: A scoping review. Review of Education, 13,1-23 e70085. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70085
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning Qualitative Research: Design and Decision Making for New Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1609406920967174
Trowler, V., Allan, R.L., Bryk, J. et al. (2022). Pathways to student engagement: beyond triggers and mechanisms at the engagement interface. Higher Education, 84, 761– 777 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00798-1
Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2023). Fostering and assessing student critical thinking: From theory to teaching practice. European Journal of Education, 58, 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12569
Wang, Q., Gao, Y., & Wang, X. (2024): Exploring Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Anxiety in Large Language Model EFL Learning: A Latent Profile Analysis of Chinese University Students. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.240040
Wang, Y., Zuo, M., He, X., & Wang, Z. (2025). Exploring Students Online Learning Behavioral Engagement in University: Factors, Academic Performance and Their Relationship. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010078
Werang, B. R., & Radja Leba, S. (2022). Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.46743/ 2160-3715/2022.5165
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (7th ed., pp. 657–700). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy316
Wong, W.H., Chapman, E. Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher Education 85, 957–978 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022- 00874-0
Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-Based Learning: An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75-79. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004
Zhou, Z., & Wang, S. (2023). Strategies for Online Student Engagement. University of Southern Mississippi. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369966738
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. The Asian Journal of Humanities, 9, 1-6. https://jurnalkemanusiaan.utm.my/index.php/kemanusiaan/article/view/165/158
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Samkeliso Takaidza, Hendri Theron
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
