Examining Extended Reality Instructional Tools for Virtual Field Trips in Nigerian High Schools
Keywords:
Extended Reality; Immersive Technology; Digital Literacy; Virtual Field Trips; Virtual Reality Field Trips, Virtual RealityAbstract
While experiential learning is central to geography education, field trips in Nigerian secondary schools are frequently constrained by insecurity, cultural barriers, and inadequate funding. As a scalable alternative, Extended Reality (XR)-enabled Virtual Field Trips (VFTs) present a promising solution. Yet, their successful classroom adoption may depend on students’ digital literacy and gender-related factors. This study investigated: (i) the digital literacy levels of geography students; (ii) students’ perceptions of XR instructional tools (XRITs) for VFTs; (iii) the influence of digital literacy on these perceptions; and (iv) the role of gender in shaping students’ perceptions. A quantitative survey design was employed, using a multistage sampling technique to select 420 Senior Secondary III students from across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones. Data were collected through a validated 30-item instrument (Cronbach’s ? = 0.831) and analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and kurtosis) and inferential statistics (linear regression and t-test). The findings revealed that students generally held positive perceptions of XRITs, with no statistically significant gender differences. Students demonstrated moderate digital literacy, with strengths in critical thinking and self-regulation, but showed weaknesses in platform navigation and multimedia interaction. Interestingly, regression analysis showed no significant relationship between digital literacy and students’ perceptions of XRITs, suggesting that initial engagement may be more influenced by the novelty and intuitive design of the tools than by digital proficiency. The study concluded that XR holds transformative potential for geography education in Nigeria. However, to realize this potential, systemic barriers must be addressed. It is recommended that XR adoption follow a context-sensitive approach, with coordinated multi-stakeholder investment in digital infrastructure to ensure equitable and sustainable implementation across schools.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.24
References
Adedokun-Shittu, N. A., Ajani, A. H., Nuhu, M. K., & Shittu, AJK. (2020). Augmented reality instructional tool in enhancing geography learners’ academic performance and retention in Osun state Nigeria. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3021–3033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10099-2
Agina-Obu, R. & Okwu, E. (2023). Impact of digital literacy on university students’ use of digital resources in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology. 13(2), pp. 60-65. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2023.13.2.3587
Ajaps S. (2015). Geography education in the google age: a case study of Nsukka local government area of Nigeria. Second 21st Century Academic Forum, 5(1), 30-45. Boston, USA. https://www.21caf.org/uploads/1/3/5/2/13527682/3_ajapsed_hrd-638_ed_fmt_logo.pdf
Alhebaishi, S., & Stone, R. (2025). Augmented sensory experience and retention: ASER framework. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, (IJACSA), 16(4), 1-10 https://thesai.org/Downloads/Volume16No4/Paper_1-Augmented_Sensory_Experience_and_Retention.pdf
Araújo, P. T., Cardoso, A. P., & Fidalgo, S. (2016). Leadership and pedagogical interaction as predictors of learning outcomes in physical education. In Z. Bekirogullari, M. Y. Minas, & R. X. Thambusamy (Eds.), ICEEPSY 2016. Education and Educational Psychology, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. (pp. 55-64). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.11.7
Arm (2022). XR, AR, VR, MR: What’s the difference in reality? https://www.arm.com/blogs/blueprint/xr-ar-vr-mr-difference
Barbu, M., Iordache, D.-D., Petre, I., Barbu, D.-C., & B?jenaru, L. (2025). Framework design for reinforcing the potential of XR technologies in transforming inclusive education. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031484
Behrendt M., & Franklin T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9(1). 235-245. https://10.12973/ijese.2014.213a
Belda-Medina, J., & Marrahi-Gomez, V. (2023). The impact of Augmented Reality (AR) on vocabulary acquisition and student motivation. Electronics, 12(3), 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030749
Caled, D. & Silva, M.J. (2022). Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5 (1), 123–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00118-8
Castellví, J., Díez-Bedmar, M.-C., & Santisteban, A. (2020). Pre-Service teachers’ critical digital literacy skills and attitudes to address social problems. Social Sciences, 9(8), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080134
Cliffe A. D. (2017) A review of the benefits and drawbacks to virtual field guides in today’s Geoscience higher education environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14 (28). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0066-x
Crogman, H. T., Cano, V. D., Pacheco, E., Sonawane, R. B., & Boroon, R. (2025). Virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in experiential learning: transforming educational paradigms. Education Sciences, 15(3), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030303
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Ellinger, J., Mess, F., Bachner, J., von Au, J., & Mall, C. (2023). Changes in social interaction, social relatedness, and friendships in education outside the classroom: A social network analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1031693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1031693
Evelpidou, N., Karkani, A., Komi, A., Giannikopoulou, A., Tzouxanioti, M., Saitis, G., Spyrou, E., & Gatou, M.-A. (2022). GIS-based virtual field trip as a tool for remote education. Geosciences, 12(9), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12090327
Federal Republic of Nigeria (2025). Budget Office of the Federation, Nigeria’ Budget. Budget Office of the Federation. https://www.budgetoffice.gov.ng/
Firomumwe, T. (2022). Exploring the opportunities of virtual fieldwork in teaching geography during covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education. 45(2). https://10.32003/igge.973983.
Goudie, A. S. (2017). The integration of human and physical geography revisited. Canadian Geographer, 61(1), 19-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cag.12315
Guo, X., Guo, Y., & Liu, Y. (2021). The development of extended reality in education: Inspiration from the research literature. Sustainability, 13(24), 13776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413776
Hargittai, E. (2016). Digital literacy is about more than just mastering technology. The conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/digital-literacy-is-about-more-than-just-mastering-technology-54142.
Hilmi D. & Y?ld?r?m A. (2021). A study on the experiences of university lecturers and students in the geography field trip. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, pp. 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.154.
Hogan, A. (2020). Digital technologies and the senior geography classroom: Teachers’ perceptions of the impact on teaching and learning. A dissertation submitted to Auckland University of Technology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education. School of Education, Auckland University of Technology. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/24290749-defb-4079-b6dd-7c863bb6b615/content
Igwe, N. J., Ekere, O. R., & Agbo, D. A. (2024). Use of digital tools in adult information literacy programmes in Nigeria: A case study of Nsukka urban. IKENGA International Journal of Institute of African Studies, 25(4), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.53836/ijia/2024/25/4/007
Joel, A., & Aride, U. (2006). Social interaction and social relationship in School children. New York: Harcourt-brace and Jovanovich Inc.
Košíková, M., & Vašani?ová, P. (2025). Exploring the link between digital readiness and sustainable development: A cluster analysis of EU countries. Sustainability, 17(11), 5080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115080
Kourtesis, P. (2024). A comprehensive review of multimodal xr applications, risks, and ethical challenges in the Metaverse. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(11), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110098
Kourtesis, P., Papadopoulou, A., & Roussos, P. (2024). Cybersickness in virtual reality: The role of individual differences, its effects on cognitive functions and motor skills, and intensity differences during and after immersion. Virtual Worlds, 3(1), 62-93. https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds3010004
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Cheng, C. C., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Computer supported cooperative prewriting for enhancing young EFL learners’ writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 134–155. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2015/lansungchengchang.pdf
Lazou, C., & Tsinakos, A. (2023). Critical immersive-triggered literacy as a key component for inclusive digital education. Education Sciences, 13(7), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070696
Lee, T., Wen, Y., Chan, M.Y., Azam, A. B., Looi, C.K., Taib, S., Ooi, C.H., Huang, L.H., Xie, Y., & Y. Cai (2022). Investigation of virtual & augmented reality classroom learning environments in university STEM education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-41, https://10.1080/10494820.2022.2155838
Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
Loan, F. A. (2012). Impact of the internet surfing on reading practices and choices. 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.webology.org/2012/v9n1/a94.html
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou C. (2024). How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimed Tools Appl, 83, 18185–18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249
Maude A. (2017). Applying the concept of powerful knowledge to school Geography. C. Brooks, G. Butt, M. Fargher (Eds.). The Power of Geographical Thinking. Springer. 27-40. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-49986-4_3
Meadows, M. E. (2020). Geography Education for Sustainable Development. Geography and Sustainability, 1(1), 88-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.02.001
Msweli, N. T., & Phahlane, M. (2025). Health-Related issues of immersive technologies: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 12(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12020047
Mystakidis, S., & Christopoulos A. (2022). Teacher perceptions on virtual reality escape rooms for STEM education. Information, 13(3), pp. 1-13, https://10.3390/info13030136
Oladosu, K. K., Adedokun-Shittu, N. A., Ajani, A. H., Kehinde, M. N., Abdullateef, B. E., & Alasan, N. J. (2021). Perception and utilisation of mobile information and communication technology for learning in secondary schools in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of Capital Development in Behavioural Sciences, 9(1), 45-63. https://www.journals.lcu.edu.ng/index.php/JCDBS/article/download/654/466/934
Onojah, A., Onojah, A., Olubode, O., & Omosewo, E. (2021). Secondary school teachers’ accessibility to internet facilities for advanced instruction in Nigeria. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3, 86-95. https://10.23917/ijolae.v3i2.10686.
Pianta, R. C. (2016). Classroom processes and teacher-student interaction: Integrations with a developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, resilience, and intervention (pp. 770–814). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy415
Preston, L. (2016). Field ‘Work’ Vs ‘Feel’ trip: Approaches to out-of-class experiences in geography education. Geographical Education, 29(1), 9-22. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1123180.pdf
Qazi, A., Hasan, N., Abayomi-Alli, O., Hardaker, G., Scherer, R., Sarker, Y., Kumar Paul, S., & Maitama, J. Z. (2022). Gender differences in information and communication technology use & skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Education and information technologies, 27(3), 4225–4258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10775-x
Rajasekhar P., Veena C. N., & Srujan Kumar (2018) Gender differences in internet preferences and usage pattern among medical students. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 8(5), 683-686. https://10.5455/njppp.2018.8.1248327122017
Sensorium (2022). What is Extended Reality - XR Explained. https://sensoriumxr.com/articles/what-is-extended-reality
Stojši?, I., Ivkov-Dzigurski, A., & Ivanovi? B. L., & Adjanin, N., & Mari?i?, O. (2021). Immersive virtual trips in geography teaching: Supplement and/or substitution for fieldwork. The 5th Serbian Congress of Geographers. https://10.13140/RG.2.2.11241.42083.
Sufian, F. D., Nico, G., & Azzarri, C. (2023). Examining the gender digital divide: A case study from rural Nigeria. International Food Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.136918
Tegoan, N., Wibowo, S., & Grandhi, S. (2021). Application of the Extended Reality technology for teaching new languages: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11360. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311360
The Geographical Association (2022). Geography contributes to SDG4. Geographical Association. https://www.geography.org.uk/Announcements-and-Updates/Page-3/geography-contributes-to-sdg4/227188
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Tortora, M., Luppi, A., Pacchiano, F., Marisei, M., Grassi, F., Werner, H., Kitamura, F. C., Tortora, F., Caranci, F., & Ferraciolli, F. S. (2025). Current applications and future perspectives of extended reality in radiology. La Radiologia Medica. 130, 905–920 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02001-2
Tussyadiah, I. P., Wang, D. Jung, T. H., & Dieck, M. Tc. (2018) Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism Management. 66(2), 140-154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO, 2015). Education for All 2000-2015: Achievements and challenges. https://en.unesco.org/gem-report/taxonomy/term/199
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wang, Y., Gong, D., Xiao, R., Wu, X., & Zhang, H. (2024). A Systematic Review on Extended Reality-Mediated Multi-User Social Engagement. Systems, 12(10), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100396
Yaseen, H., Mohammad, A. S., Ashal, N., Abusaimeh, H., Ali, A., & Sharabati, A.-A. A. (2025). The Impact of Adaptive Learning Technologies, Personalized Feedback, and Interactive AI Tools on Student Engagement: The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy. Sustainability, 17(3), 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031133
Yo, N. (2021). Digital mathematical literacy as a component of the life skills of students of modern educational institutions. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 1(1), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume03Issue01-71
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hammed Adedeji Ajani, Sam Ramaila

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).