Defining AI Fatigue in Academic Contexts: Dimensions, Indicators, and a Stage-Based Model Using Grounded Theory
Keywords:
AI fatigue; generative AI; ChatGPT; cognitive overload; cognitive offloading; over-reliance; academic integrity; grounded theory; higher educationAbstract
The integration of AI tools in academic settings has introduced a distinct form of strain that existing frameworks like technostress and digital fatigue have not yet fully addressed. This study develops a conceptual model and identifies the dimensions that define AI fatigue as a form of strain arising from sustained academic use of AI tools. Using grounded theory analysis of open-ended responses from 1,054 university students across three universities in the Philippines, the study examined the cognitive, motivational, emotional, physical, and attentional pressures students experienced during AI-supported academic work. Analysis produced five dimensions of AI fatigue, namely Cognitive Overload, Motivational Disengagement, Moral Unease, Physical Strain, and Attentional Drift, each consisting of two indicators grounded in participant accounts. The findings also yielded the AI Fatigue Model, a stage-based framework that explains how these pressures accumulate and reinforce one another across repeated AI interaction in academic tasks. These contributions establish a conceptual and exploratory foundation for AI fatigue as a distinct construct and provide a basis for future instrument validation, scale development, and cross-contextual inquiry in academic settings where AI now mediates student learning.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.5.5
References
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Avc?, M. (2026). The double-edged sword of technology: Investigating technostress and techno-eustress in academic burnout through digital literacy, internet self-efficacy, and cognitive flexibility. Computers & Education, 245, 105540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105540
Bai, Y., & Wang, S. (2025). Impact of generative AI interaction and output quality on university students’ learning outcomes: a technology-mediated and motivation-driven approach. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 24054. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08697-6
Barro II, D. (2026, February 10). Filipino students embrace AI, but schools lag in readiness-ASEAN Foundation. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2026/02/10/filipino-students-embrace-ai-but-schools-lag-in-readinessasean-foundation
Cao, S., Ali, S., Yawar, R. B., Saif, N., Goh, G. G. G., Khan, F., & Hussain, M. (2025). Constructing and validating a scale for technostress and employee behavior: evidence from business schools in a developing country. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 812. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03152-7
Carmona-Halty, M., Alarcón-Castillo, K., Semir-González, C., Sepúlveda-Páez, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2024). Burnout Assessment Tool for Students (BAT-S): evidence of validity in a Chilean sample of undergraduate university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1434412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1434412
Cazan, A.-M., David, L. T., Tru?a, C., Maican, C. I., Henter, R., N?stas?, L. E., Nummela, N., Vesterinen, O., Rosnes, A. M., Tungland, T., Gudevold, E., Digernes, M., Unz, D., Witter, S., & Pavalache-Ilie, M. (2024). Technostress and time spent online. A cross-cultural comparison for teachers and students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1377200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1377200
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Daud, N. M. (2025). From innovation to stress: analyzing hybrid technology adoption and its role in technostress among students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00529-x
Devi, K. A., & Singh, S. K. (2023). The hazards of excessive screen time: Impacts on physical health, mental health, and overall well-being. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12, 413. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_447_23
Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012
Dong, X., Wang, Z., & Han, S. (2025). Mitigating Learning Burnout Caused by Generative Artificial Intelligence Misuse in Higher Education: A Case Study in Programming Language Teaching. In Informatics (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12020051
Fabian, K., Smith, S., & Taylor-Smith, E. (2024). Being in Two Places at the Same Time: a Future for Hybrid Learning Based on Student Preferences. TechTrends, 68(4), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00974-x
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. In Societies (Vol. 15, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Ibrahim, R. K., Al Marar, Y. A., Salman, M., Jehad, S., Hamza, M. G., Abouelnasr, A. S., Abdelaliem, S. M. F., Alahmedi, S. H., & Hendy, A. (2025). Impact of multiple educational technologies on well-being: the mediating role of digital cognitive load. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 1028. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03655-z
Ibrahim, R. K., Khaled, M., Almansoori, M., Almazrouei, M., Ashraf, A., Alahmedi, S. H., & Hendy, A. (2025). Screen time and stress: understanding how digital burnout influences health among nursing students. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 990. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03621-9
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2025). Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence on student and academic well-being in higher education: a mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1498132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498132
Kumar, P. S. (2024). TECHNOSTRESS: A comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100475
Manalese, R. P., Castro, M. A. A., Simpao, L. S., Liwanag, I. G., Sese, A. V. A., Arcilla, R. T., Garcia, E. D., & Miranda, J. P. P. (2025). Exploratory Factor Analysis of AI Chatbot Use in Supporting University Students’ Academic Mental Health. 2025 1st International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Systems and Informatics (ICETISI), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETISI67983.2025.11406053
Miranda, J. P. P., Nacianceno, M. C. B., Manalese, R. P., Liwanag, I. G., Simpao, L. S., Peñaflor, M. A. F., Valdez, V. V. G., & Acoba, M. T. (2025). Dimensions of AI-Induced Fatigue Among Filipino Students: An Exploratory Study. 2025 IEEE 23rd Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOReD68498.2025.11399092
Morales-García, W. C., Sairitupa-Sanchez, L. Z., Morales-García, S. B., & Morales-García, M. (2024). Development and validation of a scale for dependence on artificial intelligence in university students. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1323898. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323898
Moralista, R., Oducado, R. M., Robles, B. R., & Rosano, D. (2022). Determinants of Zoom Fatigue Among Graduate Students of Teacher Education Program. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(13), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.31511
Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., Grummeck-Braamt, J.-V., Adam, M. T. P., & Tarafdar, M. (2024). Integrating and synthesising technostress research: a meta-analysis on technostress creators, outcomes, and IS usage contexts. European Journal of Information Systems, 33(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2154712
Nisafani, A. S., Kiely, G., & Mahony, C. (2020). Workers’ technostress: a review of its causes, strains, inhibitors, and impacts. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(sup1), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1796286
Qu, Y., Loo, H. E., & Wang, J. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Emotional tensions and ethical declaration. British Journal of Educational Technology, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70029
Quiambao, J. (2026, February 11). Asean study shows high AI use among Pinoy students, flags readiness gaps. NewsBytes.PH. https://newsbytes.ph/2026/02/11/asean-study-shows-high-ai-use-among-pinoy-students-flags-readiness-gaps
Rosales, E. F. (2026, February 10). 3 in 4 Pinoy students use AI writing tools – poll. Philstar Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/02/10/2506971/3-4-pinoy-students-use-ai-writing-tools-poll
Saleem, F., Chikhaoui, E., & Malik, M. I. (2024). Technostress in students and quality of online learning: role of instructor and university support. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1309642. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1309642
Salim, J., Tandy, S., Arnindita, J. N., Wibisono, J. J., Haryanto, M. R., & Wibisono, M. G. (2022). Zoom fatigue and its risk factors in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical Journal of Indonesia, 31(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.225703
?ambel Aykutlu, M., Aykutlu, H. C., Özveren, M., & Garip, R. (2024). Digital media use and its effects on digital eye strain and sleep quality in adolescents: A new emerging epidemic? PloS One, 19(12), e0314390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314390
Sanz-Tejeda, A., Domínguez-Oller, J. C., Baldaquí-Escandell, J. M., Gómez-Díaz, R., & García-Rodríguez, A. (2026). The impact of generative AI on academic reading and writing: a synthesis of recent evidence (2023–2025). Frontiers in Education, 10, 1711718. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1711718
Saracini, C., Cornejo-Plaza, M. I., & Cippitani, R. (2025). Techno-emotional projection in human-GenAI relationships: a psychological and ethical conceptual perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1662206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1662206
Seran, C. E., Tan, M. J. T., Abdul Karim, H., & AlDahoul, N. (2025). A conceptual exploration of generative AI-induced cognitive dissonance and its emergence in university-level academic writing. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1573368. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2025.1573368
Shalu, Verma, N., Dev, K., Bhardwaj, A. B., & Kumar, K. (2025). The Cognitive Cost of AI: How AI Anxiety and Attitudes Influence Decision Fatigue in Daily Technology Use. Annals of Neurosciences, 09727531251359872. https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251359872
Shi, J., Liu, W., & Hu, K. (2025). Exploring How AI Literacy and Self-Regulated Learning Relate to Student Writing Performance and Well-Being in Generative AI-Supported Higher Education. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 15(5), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050705
Tafesse, W., Aguilar, M. P., Sayed, S., & Tariq, U. (2024). Digital Overload, Coping Mechanisms, and Student Engagement: An Empirical Investigation Based on the S-O-R Framework. Sage Open, 14(1), 21582440241236090. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236087
Tian, J., & Zhang, R. (2025). Learners’ AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105725
Tolentino, J. C. G., & Miranda, J. P. P. (2020). Self-reported zoom exhaustion and fatigue levels among physical education teacher education students in a state university in the Philippines. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 17(3), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2024.170303
Triki, M., & Turki, A. M. (2025). Between Cognitive Overload and Dehumanization: Exploring the Dimensions of Consumer Fatigue with Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(10), 7551–7564. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000615
Usta Kara, I., & Esroy, E. G. (2022). A New Exhaustion Emerged with COVID-19 and Digitalization: A Qualitative Study on Zoom Fatigue. OPUS Toplum Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 19(46), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1069072
Wang, Q., & Yao, N. (2025). Understanding the impact of technology usage at work on academics’ psychological well-being: a perspective of technostress. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02461-1
Yang, Z., Deng, H., & Jiang, N. (2025). The impact mechanism of artificial intelligence dependence on college students’ innovation capability: an empirical study from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1732837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1732837
Yglesias-Alva, L. A., Estrada-Alva, L. A., Lizarzaburu-Montero, L. M., Miranda-Troncoso, A. E., Aguilar-Armas, H. M., & Vera-Calmet, V. G. (2025). Digital Fatigue in Peruvian University Students: Design and Validation of a Multidimensional Questionnaire. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 15(3), 431. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2025-0109
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, X., & Deng, G. (2025). Protecting work engagement from digital fatigue: the contingent roles of leadership style and network ties. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1645057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645057
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 John Paul P. Miranda, Emmanuel B. Parreño, Jovita G. Rivera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
