From Digital Practice to Pedagogical Expertise: Does Interaction with an AI-Simulated Student Impact Preservice Physics Teachers’ Skills?
Keywords:
artificial intelligence; dialogic explaining; explaining skills; generative AI; large language models; pedagogical content knowledge; physics teacher education; preservice teachers; quasi-experimental design; self-efficacy; simulation-based learningAbstract
High-quality physics instruction depends not only on what teachers know but also on how they can translate disciplinary ideas into intelligible, responsive explanations for learners who struggle. However, student-teachers often have limited opportunities for repeated, low-stakes rehearsal of dialogic explanations that target misconceptions in real time. This study, which was conducted in Kazakhstan, examined whether sustained weekly practice with a generative artificial intelligence (GAI) chatbot built on the Llama 3.1 model, simulated struggling secondary school students, and augmented preservice physics teachers’ professional development across one academic semester. A nonequivalent quasiexperimental pretest–posttest design with historical controls was implemented in an undergraduate physics teacher education program. The participants (n = 86) either received access to a purpose-built Telegram chatbot (n = 41) or completed the same semester without chatbot access (n = 45). Outcomes were assessed via an externally coded observational measure of explaining performance, a standardized test of physics-related pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and a physics teaching self-efficacy scale. The findings indicated clear advantages for the chatbot condition in explaining performance (d = 0.90), suggesting that repeated, misconception-centered dialog with a simulated student can sharpen enacted explanatory practice. In contrast, differences favoring the chatbot group in terms of PCK (d = 0.35) and physics teaching self-efficacy (d = 0.20) were modest and not conclusive within the semester timeframe. The study contributes early quantitative evidence that scalable AI-driven student-persona simulations can bolster practice-near instructional communication while also delineating boundaries of impact for broader knowledge and belief outcomes. The results support the positioning of chatbot-based rehearsal as a targeted supplement within physics teacher education.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.6.41
References
Alkan, Ö. K., Kulaks?z, T., Aksoy, N. C., Durmaz, B. N., Uçar, F. M., Özcan, M., & Kalkavan, B. (2026). Simulation-based learning approach in teaching practicum to support pre-service teachers’ teaching skills. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13951-z
Aqazade, M., Mauntel, M., & Atabas, S. (2026). Empowering mathematics teacher educators: Exploring artificial intelligence-driven mathematical tasks. School Science and Mathematics, 126(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18339
Asregid, D., Mihiretie, D. M., & Kassa, S. A. (2023). Teacher educators use of feedback to facilitate reflective practice among pre-service teachers during microteaching. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2257121
Boedeker, P. J., Moreno, N. P., Newell, A. D., Maheshwari, A., McMillin, M. A., Tippen, S. P., Pillow, M. T., & Bergemann, A. D. (2025). Pedagogical content knowledge as a lens for transforming teaching in medical and health professions education. Medical Science Educator, 35(3), 1707–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02325-8
Brandao, P. R. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on modern society. AI, 6(8), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080190
Cajueiro, D. O., & Celestino, V. R. R. (2026). A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence regulation: Weighing ethical principles and innovation. Journal of Economy and Technology, 4, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2025.07.001
Calvo-Utrilla, M., Paños, E., & Ruíz-Gallardo, J. (2026). Chatbots in science education: A scoping review of early empirical evidence. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10260-x
Carolus, A. E., McLaughlin, K. A., Lengua, L. J., Rowe, M. L., Sheridan, M. A., Zalewski, M., Moran, L., & Romeo, R. R. (2024). Conversation disruptions in early childhood predict executive functioning development: A longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 27(1), e13414. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13414
Chaitidou, M., & Peikos, G. (2026). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education. Encyclopedia, 6(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6020043
Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Sunbury, S. (2020). The impact of high school life science teachers’ subject matter knowledge and knowledge of student misconceptions on students’ learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164
Chow, M., & Ng, O. (2025). From technology adopters to creators: Leveraging AI-assisted vibe coding to transform clinical teaching and learning. Medical Teacher, 47(12), 1927–1929. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2488353
Cohen, J., Marisa Yonas, A., & Elizabeth Wilson, K. (2026). Approximating teaching: A systematic review of the research. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251368383
Conry-Murray, C., Waltzer, T., DeBernardi, F. C., Fossum, J. L., Haasova, S., Matthews, M. S., O’Mahony, A., Moreau, D., Baum, M. A., Karhulahti, V., McCarthy, R. J., Paterson, H. M., McSweeney, K., & Elsherif, M. M. (2024). Validity and transparency in quantifying open-ended data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241275217
Corral, D., & Carpenter, S. K. (2025). Effects of retrieval practice on retention and application of complex educational concepts. Learning and Instruction, 100, 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102219
Dalinger, T., Thomas, K. B., Stansberry, S., & Xiu, Y. (2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for preservice teachers. Computers and Education, 144, 103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103696
Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x
Fukaya, T., Nakamura, D., Kitayama, Y., & Nakagoshi, T. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on mathematics and science pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring its associations with teacher and student variables. Teaching and Teacher Education, 155, 104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104881
Golec, M., Hatay, E. S., Gill, S. S., & Buyya, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI): Foundations, trends and future directions. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 20, 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100265
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 111(9), 2055-2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
Han, C., Lin, C., Ku, H., & Huang, Y. (2026). An integrative educational framework to enhance logical reasoning and cognitive skills in undergraduate nursing students: A constructivist grounded theory approach. Nurse Education Today, 160, 107004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107004
Hartmuth, D., Amin, R. M., Schlichting, D., Schött, S., Haudenschild, J., Küchenhoff, H., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2025). Developing science teachers’ enacted pedagogical content knowledge through integration of student feedback into the Refined Consensus Model of pedagogical content knowledge. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2470563. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2470563
He, X., Zhou, R., Fan, Q., Xiao, X., Yu, Y., & Yan, Z. (2025). Preparing student teachers for professional development: Mentoring generative artificial intelligence (AI) learners in mathematical problem solving. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2025.3557037
Hong, S., Moon, J., Eom, T., Awoyemi, I. D., & Hwang, J. (2025). Generative AI-enhanced virtual reality simulation for pre-service teacher education: A mixed-methods analysis of usability and instructional utility for course integration. Education Sciences, 15(8), 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080997
Jerrim, J., Prieto-Latorre, C., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D., & Shure, N. (2025). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional practice, and student outcomes: Evidence from the talis video study. American Educational Research Journal, 62(2), 378-413. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241300265
Jiang, S., & Li, J. (2026). Triadic instructional design: The impact of structured AI training on pre-service teachers’ intelligent-TPACK, attitudes, and lesson planning skills. Education Sciences, 16(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020315
Jiang, Y., Feng, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Xie, L., & Bao, L. (2026). Generative AI for feedback and collaborative knowledge construction in preservice physics teacher education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 22, 010116. https://doi.org/10.1103/hm13-jv98
Johnson, M., Maitland, E., & Sofka, W. (2025). Developing judgement for business: An AI-based model of independent management learning. Journal of Business Research, 204, 115842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115842
Kammermeier, M., Muckenthaler, M., Weiß, S., & Kiel, E. (2025). Feminization of teaching: Gender and motivational factors of choosing teaching as a career. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1471015. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1471015
Kavanagh, S. S., Metz, M., Hauser, M., Fogo, B., Taylor, M. W., & Carlson, J. (2020). Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers’ responsiveness to students’ ideas. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119841884
Kirschner, S., Borowski, A., Fischer, H. E., Gess-Newsome, J., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2016). Developing and evaluating a paper-and-pencil test to assess components of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1343–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1190479
Kulgemeyer, C., & Geelan, D. (2024). Towards a constructivist view of instructional explanations as a core practice of science teachers. Science Education, 108, 1034–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21863
Kulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018). From professional knowledge to professional performance: The impact of CK and PCK on teaching quality in explaining situations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1393–1418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21457
Kulgemeyer, C., Borowski, A., Buschhüter, D., Enkrott, P., Kempin, M., Reinhold, P., Riese, J., Schecker, H., Schröder, J., & Vogelsang, C. (2020). Professional knowledge affects action-related skills: The development of preservice physics teachers’ explaining skills during a field experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1554–1582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21632
Kurtz, G., Amzalag, M., Shaked, N., Zaguri, Y., Kohen-Vacs, D., Gal, E., Zailer, G., & Barak-Medina, E. (2024). Strategies for integrating generative AI into higher education: navigating challenges and leveraging opportunities. Education Sciences, 14(5), 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050503
Lakens, D., & Caldwell, A. R. (2021). Simulation-Based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951503
Lee, D., & Yeo, S. (2022). Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics. Computers and Education, 191, 104646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104646
Lee, D., Son, T., & Yeo, S. (2025). Impacts of interacting with an AI chatbot on preservice teachers' responsive teaching skills in math education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), e13091. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13091
Littell, W. N., & Peterson, B. L. (2025). AI-powered chatbots to simulate executive interactions for students performing stakeholder analysis. Communication Teacher, 39(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2024.2405188
Liu, C. C., Wang, H. J., Wang, D., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, Y. (2024). An interactive technological solution to foster preservice teachers’ theoretical knowledge and instructional design skills: A chatbot-based 5E learning approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6698–6716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2277761
Liu, Z., Cheon, S., Stanbury, A., Jiao, X., Xing, W., & Kang, H. (2026). Towards contextual-based AI: A scoping review of artificial intelligence in X reality for personalized learning. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 10, 100523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100523
Luo, J., Zhu, C., Hu, L., & Sun, M. (2025). Empowering preservice teachers through textbook design activities with GAI-based chatbot. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 18, 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2025.3606757
Mikeska, J. N., Howell, H., & Kinsey, D. (2023). Do simulated teaching experiences impact elementary preservice teachers’ ability to facilitate argumentation-focused discussions in mathematics and science? Journal of Teacher Education, 74(5), 422-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221142842
Molina-Soria, M., Aparicio-Herguedas, J. L., Fuentes-Nieto, T., & López-Pastor, V. M. (2026). The combination of artificial intelligence and formative assessment in teacher education: A systematic review. Encyclopedia, 6(3), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6030066
Norton, S. (2019). Middle school mathematics pre-service teachers’ content knowledge, confidence and self-efficacy. Teacher Development, 23(5), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1668840
Park, S., & Chan, K. K. H. (2026). Unpacking PCK relationships and development in science teachers: A systematic synthesis of empirical research. Review of Educational Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251394404
Pastötter, B., Urban, J., Lötzer, J., & Frings, C. (2022). Retrieval practice enhances new learning but does not affect performance in subsequent arithmetic tasks. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.216
Peikos, G., & Stavrou, D. (2025). ChatGPT for science lesson planning: An exploratory study based on pedagogical content knowledge. Education Sciences, 15(3), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030338
Sapkota, B., & Max, B. (2024). A conceptual synthesis on approximations of practice in mathematics teacher education. Research in Mathematics Education, 26(3), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2023.2207088
Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., Réale, D., Dochtermann, N. A., Garamszegi, L. Z., & Araya-Ajoy, Y. G. (2020). Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13434
Shi, Y., Yu, K., Dong, Y., & Chen, F. (2026). Large language models in education: A systematic review of empirical applications, benefits, and challenges. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 10, 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100529
Shrestha, S., & Yi, J. (2026). TPACK-based professional development for the AI era: Fostering pre-service teachers’ acceptance of generative AI in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-026-09747-0
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Sohrabi, Z., Ghasemi, S., Nouri Khaneghah, Z., Barry, A., Zhianifard, A., & Nosrati, S. (2025). A scoping review of quasi-experimental studies on simulation-based learning in medical education: Trends and insights from the last decade. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 39, 70. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.70
Son, T., Yeo, S., & Lee, D. (2024). Exploring elementary preservice teachers’ responsive teaching in mathematics through an artificial intelligence-based chatbot. Teaching and Teacher Education, 146, 104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104640
Stavropoulou, G., Daniilidou, A., & Nerantzaki, K. (2025). Exploring the Interplay of motivation, self-efficacy, critical thinking, and self-regulation in predicting academic achievement among university students. F1000Research, 14, 344. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.161821.2
Su, Y., Luo, M., & Zhong, C. (2025). To chat or not: Pre-service English teachers’ perceptions of and needs in chatbot’s educational application. SAGE Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251321853
Sun, Q., & Wang, W. (2025). Peer effects and learning mechanisms of digital innovation: Evidence from manufacturing industry in China. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 79, 101938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2025.101938
Xiong, X. (2025). Influence of teaching styles of higher education teachers on students’ engagement in learning: The mediating role of learning motivation. Education for Chemical Engineers, 51, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2025.02.005
Yip, S. Y. (2025). Transition into teaching: Examining the pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) development of pre-service STEM career-change teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 51(3), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2025.2471901
Zhang, C., Hu, M., Wu, W., Chen, Y., Wang, K., Gao, T., & Fu, Q. (2026). AI versus teacher feedback in developing pre-service teachers’ teaching self-efficacy: A quasi-experimental study in simulated teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 172, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105355
Zhang, N., Ke, F., Dai, C., Southerland, S. A., & Barrett, A. (2026). Science and mathematics preservice teachers’ perceptions and experiences of practicing dialogic teaching in generative AI-powered virtual reality simulation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 171, 105349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105349
Zhang, N., Ke, F., Dai, C., Southerland, S. A., & Yuan, X. (2024). Seeking to support preservice teachers’ responsive teaching: Leveraging artificial intelligence?supported virtual simulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(3), 1148–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13522
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kuanysh Zhakpayev, Yerlan Andasbayev, Nazym Zhanatbekova, Aigerim Abdulayeva, Anastassiya Shendel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
