Social Cognitive Theory Perspective on Undergraduate Accounting Students’ Intentions to Register for Corporate Social Responsibility Courses in China: The Mediating Role of Proactive Personality and the Moderating Role of Self-Identity

Authors

  • Xiaoxiao Jia
  • Haslinah Muhamad
  • Tze San Ong
  • Zaidi Bin Mat Daud
  • Humei Zhang
  • Hong Guo

Keywords:

social cognitive theory; self?identity; proactive personality; CSR course; behavioral intention

Abstract

Growing expectations for corporate social responsibility (CSR) competence in the accounting profession have increased the need to understand why undergraduate accounting students choose CSR-related coursework. Drawing on social cognitive theory (SCT), this study investigates how self-efficacy and outcome expectancy shape undergraduate accounting students’ intentions to enroll in CSR courses, and whether these effects operate through proactive personality (mediator) and vary by self-identity (moderator). Using a cross-sectional survey of accounting undergraduates in Hebei, China (n = 372), we analyzed the proposed moderated-mediation model with structural equation modeling in AMOS 24.0 and supplementary moderation/mediation tests in SPSS. Results indicate that self-efficacy and outcome expectancy both significantly predict proactive personality, which in turn partially mediates their effects on enrollment intention. Importantly, self-identity strengthens the links from self-efficacy to proactive personality and from outcome expectancy to proactive personality, such that these relationships are stronger among students with high self-identity. The findings extend SCT in business education by (a) identifying proactive personality as an agency-based mechanism translating SCT cognitions into course-selection intentions and (b) demonstrating self-identity as a boundary condition that amplifies SCT pathways. The strong effect of outcome expectancy also challenges the view that outcome expectancy is secondary to self-efficacy in this context, suggesting that students must anticipate tangible benefits from CSR coursework. Practically, curriculum planners should communicate clear CSR course outcomes and consider placement in the sixth or seventh semester to enhance social responsibility awareness.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.4.3

References

Abugjreiban, T. (2023). Impact of Using Some Active Learning Strategies in a Curricula and Teaching Methods Course on the Learning Motivation Level and the Development of Critical Thinking Skills Among the Students of the Faculty of Arts at Al-Zaytoonah University. Research Article. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i20.6691

Aguilera, R. V., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marano, V., & Tashman, P. A. (2021). The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1468-1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321991212

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1037/10520-147

Al-Hazaima, H., Low, M., & Sharma, U. (2024). The integration of education for sustainable development into accounting education: stakeholders’ salience perspectives. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-06-2023-0105

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Bandura, A. (1986). Social cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 103(3), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.421

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 11). Freeman. https://doi.org/10.1007/978?1?4615?0660?5

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura, A. (2018). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bansal, G., Muzatko, S., & Shin, S. I. (2021). Information system security policy noncompliance: the role of situation-specific ethical orientation. Information Technology & People, 34(1), 250-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2019-0109

Berzonsky, M. D., & Kinney, A. (2019). Identity processing style and depression: The mediational role of experiential avoidance and self-regulation. Identity, 19(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2019.1567341

Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(2), 182. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022?0167.45.2.182

Borges, J. C., Ferreira, T. C., de Oliveira, M. S. B., Macini, N., & Caldana, A. C. F. (2017). Hidden curriculum in student organizations: Learning, practice, socialization and responsible management in a business school. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.003

Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676-713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and responsibility: creating value for business, society and the environment. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-017-0016-5

Carroll, A. B., & Brown, J. A. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: A review of current concepts, research, and issues. Corporate social responsibility, 39-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920180000002002

Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal of management reviews, 12(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263237309990157

Charng, H. W., Piliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (1988). Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786895

Chu, M., Muhamad, H. B., Mustapha, M. B., San, O. T., Zan, F., & Jia, X. (2022). Research Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 14(21), 14185. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114185

Chyung, S. Y. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/qrd.2007.8.3.213

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 15(4), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.118

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(1), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x

Eriandani, R., & Wijaya, L. I. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Controversial Versus Noncontroversial Industries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 953-965. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO3.0953

Fang, M., Pan, R., Ding, R., Hou, Z., & Wang, D. (2024). Effect of proactive personality on career adaptability of higher vocational college students: the mediating role of college experience. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1333677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1333677

Fishman, J., Lushin, V., & Mandell, D. S. (2020). Predicting implementation: comparing validated measures of intention and assessing the role of motivation when designing behavioral interventions. Implementation science communications, 1, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00050-4

Fishman, J., Lushin, V., & Mandell, D. S. (2020). Understanding employees' intentions to engage in organizational citizenship behaviors: The role of perceived organizational support and subjective norms. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 569-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04170-0

Francischetti, I., Vieira, C., Pio, D., Soares, M., Colela, A., Nunes, C., & Parpineli, V. (2014). Active Learning Methodologies: An Experience for Faculty Training at Medical Education. Research Article. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce .2014.521210

Gallego, I. (2006). The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(2), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.94

Galvão, A., Mendes, L., Marques, C., & Mascarenhas, C. (2019). Factors influencing students’ corporate social responsibility orientation in higher education. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.059

Glavi?, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of cleaner production, 15(18), 1875-1885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006

Hadi, N. U., & Abdel-Razzaq, A. I. (2024). Promoting sustainable learning among accounting students: evidence from field experimental design. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 14(2), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2023-0058

Hopkins, C. D., Ferrell, O. C., Ferrell, L., & Hopkins, K. H. (2021). Changing perceptions of marketing ethics and social responsibility in principles of marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 43(2), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475321995553

Hu, R., Wang, L., Zhang, W., & Bin, P. (2018). Creativity, proactive personality, and entrepreneurial intention: the role of entrepreneurial alertness. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00951

Ikram, M., Sroufe, R., Mohsin, M., Solangi, Y. A., Shah, S. Z. A., & Shahzad, F. (2020). Does CSR influence firm performance? A longitudinal study of SME sectors of Pakistan. Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-12-2018-0088

Jackson, D., Michelson, G., & Munir, R. (2023). Developing accountants for the future: New technology, skills, and the role of stakeholders. Accounting Education, 32(2), 150-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2057195

Jiang, Z., Wang, Y., Li, W., Peng, K. Z., & Wu, C. H. (2023). Career proactivity: A bibliometric literature review and a future research agenda. Applied Psychology, 72(1), 144-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps .12446

Kainzbauer, A., Rungruang, P., & Hallinger, P. (2021). How does research on sustainable human resource management contribute to corporate sustainability: A document co-citation analysis, 1982–2021. Sustainability, 13(21), 11745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111745

Kashif, M., Zarkada, A., & Ramayah, T. (2018). The impact of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on managers’ intentions to behave ethically. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(5-6), 481-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1209970

Kempster, S., & Jackson, B. (2021). Leadership for what, why, for whom and where? A responsibility perspective. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1861721

Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2012). Understanding the psychology of attitudes: A review of attitudes research guided by theories of behavioral intention and dual-process models. Psychology of attitudes, 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118760772.ch5

Kim, S., Lee, G., & Kang, H. G. (2021). Risk management and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(1), 202-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3220

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X .13.1.3

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.3

Lapsley, D. K., & Stey, P. C. (2008). Moral self-identity as the aim of education. Handbook of moral and character education, 46, 30-52. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931431-10

Lent, R. W., Lopez Jr, A. M., Lopez, F. G., & Sheu, H. B. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of vocational behavior, 73(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.002

Lin, S. H., Lu, W. C., Chen, M. Y., & Chen, L. H. (2014). Association between proactive personality and academic self–efficacy. Current Psychology, 33, 600-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9231-8

Locke, E. A. (2020). Goal setting theory: A half century of progress. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1229-1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127

Lopez, M., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of business ethics, 75(3), 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8

Lu, H., Liu, X., & Falkenberg, L. (2022). Investigating the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on risk management practices. Business & Society, 61(2), 496-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320928981

Lu, T., Sivaramakrishnan, K., Wang, Y., & Yu, L. (2021). The real effects of mandatory corporate social responsibility reporting in China. Production and Operations Management, 30(5), 1493-1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13334

MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2011). Common method variance as a control variable in research using PLS. Journal of Retailing, 87(S1), S63-S72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.03.001

Mascarenhas, C., Mendes, L., Marques, C., & Galvão, A. (2020). Exploring CSR’s influence on employees’ attitudes and behaviours in higher education. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(4), 653-678. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2018-0101

Navarro, R. L., Flores, L. Y., Legerski, J. P., Brionez, J., May, S. F., Suh, H. N., ... & Jung, A. K. (2019). Social cognitive predictors of engineering students’ academic persistence intentions, satisfaction, and engagement. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000319

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.

Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Emory University.http://www .emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations for how to control it. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1433-1440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92.https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006

Drumwright, M., Prentice, R., & Biasucci, C. (2015). Behavioral ethics and teaching ethical decision making. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(3), 431-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12071

Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus and international business: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(5), 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22161

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930687

Reavis, M., Singh, K., & Tucci, J. (2021). Millennials' Strategic Decision Making Through the Lens of Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Management. Journal of Business Strategies, 38(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5156275

Schoenfeld, J., Segal, G., & Borgia, D. (2017). Social cognitive career theory and the goal of becoming a certified public accountant. *Journal of Career Development*, 44(4), 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274909

Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of applied psychology, 84(3), 416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84 .3.416

Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with ‘green consumerism’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786955

Springer, S. H., Larson, L. M., Tilley, B. P., Gasser, C. E., & Quinn, A. C. (2001). The Development of an Educational and Career Outcome Expectancy Scale. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.2.06

Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2290-5

Sudhana, P., Ameen, A., & Isaac, O. (2020). A multi-theoretical framework to better understand the college major choice in arts and design. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 1009-1023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2020-0012

Tangngisalu, J., Mappamiring, M., ANDAYANI, W., Yusuf, M., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2020). CSR and firm reputation from employee perspective. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb .2020.vol7.no10.171

Terry, D. J., & O'Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behaviour: The effects of perceived behavioural control and self?efficacy. British journal of social psychology, 34(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j .2044-8309.1995.tb02324.x

Tien, N. H., Anh, D. B. H., & Ngoc, N. M. (2020). Corporate financial performance due to sustainable development in Vietnam. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 694-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1915

Van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business ethics, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023383229086

Wu, C. H., Parker, S. K., Wu, L. Z., & Lee, C. (2018). When and why people engage in different forms of proactive behavior: Interactive effects of self-construals and work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 293-323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1064

Wu, H. Q., Chen, Y. W., & Liu, R. (2020, September). College Education Outcome Expectation and Proactive Personality as Predictors of Chinese College Students' Learning Motivation, Career Adaptability as a Mediator. In 2020 International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management (ICMEIM) (pp. 716-721). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEIM51375.2020.00160

Wu, W., Liu, Y., Chin, T., & Zhu, W. (2018). Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020268

Yu, L., Fan, W., Wang, Z., Wang, X., & Yu, C. (2021). The antecedent role of proactive personality in career self-management. Journal of College Student Development, 62(3), 351-355. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0033

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Jia, X. ., Muhamad, H. ., Ong, T. S. ., Daud, Z. B. M. ., Zhang, H. ., & Guo, H. . (2026). Social Cognitive Theory Perspective on Undergraduate Accounting Students’ Intentions to Register for Corporate Social Responsibility Courses in China: The Mediating Role of Proactive Personality and the Moderating Role of Self-Identity. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(4), 56–82. Retrieved from http://www.ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2793

Issue

Section

Articles