Mathematics in English? A Pilot Study on the Benefits of an Interdisciplinary Experience in Initial Primary Teacher Education

Authors

  • Elsa Santaolalla
  • Magdalena Custodio-Espinar
  • Eva Jechimer
  • Alfonso López-Hernández

Keywords:

bilingual education; interdisciplinarity; collaborative teaching; teacher self-efficacy

Abstract

Although Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is regulated in bilingual education programmes in Spain, the collaboration between mathematics and English as a foreign language (EFL) is generally a controversial topic. This study addresses some of these challenges and analyses the impact of an interdisciplinary experience in preservice primary teacher education, integrating mathematics and English instruction through a collaborative teaching project. The objective is to assess whether this approach influences teacher self-efficacy, perceptions of interdisciplinary teaching, and acceptance of the CLIL approach in mathematics. The research involved 119 preservice teachers in a pre-test-post-test design with non-equivalent experimental (N=59) and control (N=60) groups, using pre- and post-treatment measures with an ad hoc questionnaire comprising 17 items grouped into three dimensions: teacher self-efficacy, interdisciplinary teaching, and Maths CLIL. The results show a significant improvement in the experimental group in teacher self-efficacy for both mathematics and English instruction, as well as in the perception of interdisciplinary collaborations between the mathematics and English subjects. However, no significant changes were observed in attitudes toward teaching mathematics in English. The findings suggest that interdisciplinary experiences between mathematics and English can enhance preservice teacher training and recommend integrating collaborative teaching strategies and expanding CLIL training in mathematics to optimize the professional development of future teachers.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.4.20

References

Alcántara-Manzanares, J., Aguilar-Cubillo, S., & Vara-López, A. (2022). Contar las ciencias: Una práctica interdisciplinar en la formación inicial del profesorado en Educación Primaria bilingüe [Counting science: An interdisciplinary practice in initial teacher training for bilingual primary education]. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 26(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v26i1.15715

Alcaraz-Mármol, G., & Guadamillas, M. V. (2019). Bilingual Education in Spain: An Analysis of L2 Methodological Requirements and Non-Linguistic Disciplines Within Primary Education Legislation. Issues and Ideas in Education, 7(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.15415/iie.2019.72006

Alsina, Á. (2019). Itinerarios didácticos para la enseñanza de las matemáticas (6-12 años) [Educational itineraries for teaching mathematics (6-12 years old)]. Graò. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332264273_Itinerarios_didacticos_para_la_ensenanza_de_las_matematicas_6-12_anos

Arroyo, M. J., Pinedo, R., & de la Iglesia, M. (2020). Coordinación docente e interdisciplinariedad para la adquisición de competencias en el Grado de Educación Primaria e Infantil: Percepciones de alumnado y profesorado [Teaching coordination and interdisciplinarity for the acquisition of skills in Primary and Early Childhood Teacher Education: Perceptions of students and teachers]. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 35, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2020.35.009

Ashby, I., & Exter, M. (2019). Designing for Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education: Considerations for Instructional Designers. TechTrends, 63, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0352-z

Australian Government Department of Education. (2022, May). Australian Curriculum. https://www.education.gov.au/australian-curriculum

Bairy, S., & Inamdar, N. (2025). Exploring CLIL-based bilingual mathematics teaching for enhanced conceptual understanding. Discover Education, 4, 533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00795-x

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.

Baker, W. D., & Däumer, E. (2015). Designing interdisciplinary instruction: exploring disciplinary and conceptual differences as a resource. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 10(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.999776

Biseth, H., Svenkerud, S. W., Magerøy, S. M., & Rubilar, K. H. (2022). Relevant Transformative Teacher Education for Future Generations. Frontiers in Education, 7, 806495. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.806495

Boix, V., & Dawes, E. (2007). Targeted Assessment of Students' Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11780874

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549

Department of Education and Youth. (2025, November 17). Enactment of the Primary Language Curriculum: a focus on Irish. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-education/publications/enactment-of-the-primary-language-curriculum-a-focus-on-irish/

Dicks, J., & Genesee, F. (2016). Bilingual Education in Canada. In O. García, A. Lin & S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and Multilingual Education (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02324-3_32-1

Doig, B., Williams, J., Swanson, D., Borromeo, R., & Drake, P. (Eds.). (2019). Interdisciplinary Mathematics Education. The State of the Art and Beyond. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11066-6

Durán-Martínez, R., & Fernández-Costales, A. (2025). Bilingual education in Spain: A critical review of stakeholders’ perceptions. Language Teaching, 58(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000508

Eurydice. (2024, March 19). Slovenia: Other dimensions of internationalisation in early childhood and school education. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia/slovenia/other-dimensions-internationalisation-early-childhood-and-school-education

Eurydice. (2025a, April 10). Germany: Other dimensions of internationalisation in early childhood and school education. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia/germany/other-dimensions-internationalisation-early-childhood-and-school-education

Eurydice. (2025b, October 27). Finland: Fundamental principles and national policies. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia/finland/fundamental-principles-and-national-policies

Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015). Title III—Language Instruction for English Learners and Immigrant Students. https://www.everystudentsucceedsact.org/title-ii--1

Faez, F., Karas, M., & Uchihara, T. (2019). Connecting language proficiency to teaching ability: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819868667

Hettinger, K., Lazarides, R., & Schiefele, U. (2023). Motivational climate in mathematics classrooms: teacher self-efficacy for student engagement, student- and teacher-reported emotional support and student interest. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01430-x

Holliday, A. (2010). Analysing qualitative data. In B. Paltridge, & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum companion to research methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 98–110). Bloomsbury.

Jechimer, E., López, A., & Santaolalla, E. (2024). MathEnglish: una propuesta interdisciplinar entre didáctica de las matemáticas y de la lengua inglesa en la formación inicial de maestros [MathEnglish: An interdisciplinary proposal between mathematics and English language didactics in initial teacher training]. In OAID (Ed.), Buenas prácticas en docencia Comillas 2022–23 (pp. 126–135). Servicio de Publicaciones Comillas. https://doi.org/10.14422/9788484687627.016

Kanaan, E. M., Kadhim, A. M., Alakashee, B. A., AlAli, R. M., Al-Barakat, A. A., Abdullatif, A. K., Aboud, Y. Z., & Helali, M. M. (2025). Digital Kinetic Storytelling as an Innovative Strategy for Enhancing Language Learning in Early Childhood Classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(8), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.8.21

Klassen, R., & Tze, V. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001

Klein, J. T. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and Complexity: An Evolving Relationship. Emergence: Complexity & Organization 6(1–2), 2–10. https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A1%3A36995633/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A16373108&crl=c&link_origin=none

Lazarides, R., Fauth, B., Gaspard, H., & Göllner, R. (2021). Teacher self-efficacy and enthusiasm: Relations to changes in student-perceived teaching quality at the beginning of secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 73, 101435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101435

Lyall, C., Meagher, L., & Bruce, A. (2015). A rose by any other name? Transdisciplinarity in the context of UK research policy. Futures, 65, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.009

Ministry of Education Singapore. (2025, October). Mathematics Syllabus. Primary One to Six. https://www.moe.gov.sg/api/media/92bff26d-b2b4-4535-b868-b8415c744b91/2021-Primary-Mathematics-Syllabus-P1-to-P6-Updated-October-2025.pdf

Moore, P., & Lorenzo, F. (2015). Task-based learning and content and language integrated learning materials design: process and product. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1053282

Morton, T. (2016). Being a language teacher in the content classroom: Teacher identity and content and language integrated learning (CLIL). In S. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 382–394). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669816

Moschkovich, J. N. (2024). Language and learning mathematics: A sociocultural approach to academic literacy in mathematics. In J. Wang (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 2, ((pp. 459–472). World Scientifc Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811287183_0031

Perera, H. N., & John, J. E. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for teaching math: Relations with teacher and student outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101842

Perry, C., Sampson, S., & Ayala-Diaz, M. (2023). Investigating Hispanic Preservice Teachers’ Mathematics Anxiety, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 10(3), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.17278/ijesim.1217360

Pires, L., Mancebón, M. J., Mediavilla, M., & Gómez-Sancho, J. M. (2024). New evidence on the impact of learning in a foreign language on educational outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101386

Pla-Campas, G., Arumí-Prat, J., & Simó-Gil, N. (2022). Análisis de los efectos de un proyecto innovador de co-docencia en la universidad [Analysis of the effects of an innovative co-teaching project at university]. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 25(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.499111

Planas, N., & Pimm, D. (2024). Mathematics education research on language and on communication including some distinctions: Where are we now?. ZDM Mathematics Education 56, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01497-0

Pozuelos, F. J., Rodríguez, F. P., & Travé, G. (2012). El enfoque interdisciplinar en la Enseñanza Universitaria y el aprendizaje basado en la investigación. Un estudio de caso en el marco de la formación [Interdisciplinary Approach in the Higher Education Context. A Case Study]. Revista de Educación, 357, 561–585. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-357-073

Prieto, L. (2007). Autoeficacia del profesorado universitario. Eficacia percibida y práctica docente [Self-efficacy of university teaching staff. Perceived efficacy and teaching practice]. Narcea. http://hdl.handle.net/11531/97063

Prochazkova, L. T. (2013). Mathematics for language, language for mathematics. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9383

Ruiz-Cecilia, R., Medina-Sánchez, L., & Rodríguez-García, A. (2023). Teaching and Learning of Mathematics through CLILL, CBI, or EMI-A Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics, 11(6), 1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061347

Schanke, A. (2023). Improving Mathematical Self-Efficacy of Preservice Elementary Teachers. PRIMUS, 33(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2022.2068092

Segarra, J., & Julia?, C. (2022). Mathematics Teaching Efficacy Belief and Attitude of Pre-service Teachers and Academic Achievement. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11381

Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253

Shafiee, N. S., & Ghani, M. A. (2022). The Influence of Teacher Efficacy on 21st Century Pedagogy. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.13

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher Self-efficacy and Perceived Autonomy: Relations with Teacher Engagement, Job Satisfaction and Emotional Exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.pr0.114k14w0

Surmont, J., Struys, E., Van Den Noort, M., & Van De Craen, P. (2016). The effects of CLIL on mathematical content learning: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.7

Tayfour, E. A., & Alabdulaziz, M. S. (2025). Language challenges in mathematics courses for non-native English-speaking students: A literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 740–757. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.35

Ter Kuile, H., Veldhuis, M., Van Veen, S. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). Bilingual education, metalinguistic awareness, and the understanding of an unknown language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728910000258

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Ugalde, L., Bernaras, E., Rodríguez, E., & Odria, A. (2020). El Trabajo Interdisciplinar de Módulo como herramienta para el desarrollo de competencias transversales [Interdisciplinary Module-Based Work as a tool for development of Transversal Competencies]. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 34(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v34i1.76567

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press

Xiao, M., Amzah, F., & Rong, W. (2023). Experience of Beauty: Valuing Emotional Engagement and Collaboration in Teacher–Child Storytelling Activities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.10

Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Classroom Processes, Student Academic Adjustment, and Teacher Well-Being: A Synthesis of 40 Years of Research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Santaolalla, E. ., Custodio-Espinar, . M., Jechimer, E. ., & López-Hernández, A. . (2026). Mathematics in English? A Pilot Study on the Benefits of an Interdisciplinary Experience in Initial Primary Teacher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(4), 430–453. Retrieved from http://www.ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2810

Issue

Section

Articles