Cross-Boundary Collaboration and Problem-Solving to Promote 21st Century Skills— Students’ Experiences

Authors

  • Hanna Vuojärvi
  • Miikka Eriksson
  • Henriikka Vartiainen

Keywords:

21st century skills; design-based research; higher education; pedagogical development; cross-boundary teams

Abstract

This study is part of an ongoing design-based research initiative, during which a new course on forest bioeconomics was designed and implemented in higher education context. The pedagogy of the new course was informed by the framework of 21st century skills, ideas of collaborative problem-solving and knowledge building, cross-boundary teaming, and online and blended learning. During the implementation of the pilot course, in-depth group interview data were collected and WhatsApp discussion threads were used as supplementary data. Participants included students (n=18) from Finnish universities and universities of applied sciences who enrolled in and completed the course. The data were analyzed qualitatively with the aim of finding out how 21st century skills were manifested in students' experiences of collaborative problem-solving in cross-boundary teams in blended or online learning settings. It was also considered, if there were differences in the experiences of students from blended and online course options. The results of the qualitative analysis provide multiple implications for course development in upcoming design-based research cycles.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.13.3

References

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2010). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.

American Association of Colleges and Universities (2007). College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/GlobalCentury_final.pdf

Barab, S., & Squire, B. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.

Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. New York, NY: Routledge.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22(1), 1–18.

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27(1), 1–13.

Chan, C. (2013). Collaborative knowledge building: Towards a knowledge-creation perspective. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C., Chinn, C. K. K, Chan, & A. O'Donnell. (Eds.), The International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 437–461). New York, NY: Routledge.

Cook-Sather, A., & Luz, A. (2014). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: What happens when students cross the threshold of student–faculty partnership. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1097–1109.

Cress, U., Rosé, C. P., Law, N., & Ludvigsen, S. (2019). Investigating the complexity of computer-supported collaborative learning in action. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 37–142.

Damsa, C. (2014). The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 247–281.

Dede, C. (2010). Comparing frameworks for “21st century skillsâ€. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills. Rethinking how students learn (pp. 51–75). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5–8.

Edmondson, A., & Harvey, J.-F. (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 347–360.

European Union (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union L 394, 10–18. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF

Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Communities of learning in the classroom. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 177–225). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., Kangas, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2013). Socio-cultural perspectives on collaborative learning: Towards collaborative knowledge creation. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 57–73). New York, NY: Routledge.

Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. New York: Routledge.

Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1–36.

Hämäläinen, R., Kiili, C., & Smith, B. E. (2017). Orchestrating 21st century learning in higher education: A perspective on student voice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1106–1118.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

Gray, D. (2014). Doing research in the real world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Grion, V. (2014). ‘Student voice’ in Italy: The state of the art. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(20), 1–4.

International Society for Technology in Education (2007). The national educational technology standards and performance indicators for students. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140.

Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: Unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 37–48.

Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. New York, NY: Routledge.

Leeman, Y., & Wardekker, W. (2011). Redesigning vocational education: The possibilities of design-based research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 313–331.

Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Washington, DC: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220040581_Authentic_Learning_for_the_21st_Century_An_Overview

Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97–100.

Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills for 21st century learners. Retrieved from https://www.cwasd.k12.wi.us/highschl/newsfile1062_1.pdf

Mingfong, J., Yam San, C., & Ek Ming, T. (2010). Unpacking the design process in design-based research. In S. R. Goldman, J. Pellegrino, K. Gomez, L. Lyons & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2010 (Part 2, pp. 470–471). Illinois, USA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Mishra, P., & Kereluik, K. (2011). What 21st century learning? A review and synthesis. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of the SITE conference (pp. 3301–3312). Nashville, TN: Society of Information Technology and Teacher Education.

Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6–19.

Muukkonen-van der Meer, H. (2011). Perspectives on knowledge creating inquiry in higher education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Institute of Behavioural Science). Retrieved from: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/24260/perspect.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., Kaistinen, J., & Nyman, G. (2010). Knowledge creating inquiry in a distributed project-management course. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(2), 73–96.

Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning-A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68(1), 1–14.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills. Education 2030. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

Paavola, S., Engeström, R., & Hakkarainen, K. (2012). The trialogical approach as a new form of mediation. In A. Moen, A. I. Mørch, & S. Paavola (Eds.), Collaborative knowledge creation (pp. 2–14) Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2019). Framework for 21st century skills. Hilliard, OH: Battelle for Kids. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf

Poon, J. (2013) Blended learning: an institutional approach for enhancing students' learning experiences. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271–288.

Rasi, P., & Vuojärvi, H. (2018). Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 292–304.

Rosefsky Saavedra, A., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13.

Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2011). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 231–300). New York, NY: Springer.

Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.

Sieber, J. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research. A guide for students and internal review boards. London, UK: Sage.

Stahl, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (in press). Theories of CSCL. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. Wise & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning. New York, NY: Springer. Retrieved from: http://gerrystahl.net/pub/cscltheories.pdf

Tassone, V. C., O’Mahony, C., McKenna, E., Eppink, H. J., & Wals, A. E. J. (2018). (Re-) designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: A responsible research and innovation perspective. Higher Education, 76(2), 337–352.

van Heijst, H., de Jong, F. P. C. M., van Aalst, J., de Hoog, N., & Kirschner, P. (2019). Socio-cognitive openness in online knowledge building discourse: Does openness keep conversations going? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(2), 165–184.

Vartiainen, H. (2014). Principles of design-oriented pedagogy for learning from and with museum objects (Doctoral dissertation, University of Eastern Finland, School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education, Joensuu). Joensuu, Finland: University of Eastern Finland. Retrieved from: http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_978-952-61-1484-2/urn_isbn_978-952-61-1484-2.pdf

Vuojärvi, H. (2013). Conceptualising personal and mobile learning environments in higher education—Focus on students’ perspective (Doctoral dissertation, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi). Rovaniemi, Finland: Lapland University Press. Retrieved from: https://lauda.ulapland.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/61642/Vuoj%c3%a4rvi_Hanna_ActaE_133pdfA.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology: Enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.

Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C.L., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.

Zurita, G., Hasbun, B., Baloian, N., & Jerez, O. (2014). A blended learning environment for enhancing meaningful learning using 21st century skills. In G. Chen, V. Kumar, Kinshuk, R. Huang, & S. Kong (eds.), Emerging issues in smart learning. Lecture notes in educational technology. (pp. 1–8). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30