Balancing Intelligence and Emotion: Mapping Global Research on Artificial Intelligence and Student Anxiety in Higher Education (2020-2024)

Authors

  • Lim Seong Pek
  • Fatin Syamilah Che Yob
  • Sevagamy Jayaraman
  • Nur Ilyani Idris
  • Pipit Rahayu
  • Budi Waluyo

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI); higher education; student anxiety; generative AI; emotional well-being

Abstract

Generative AI technologies have changed how higher education works in terms of teaching and learning. Such changes opened up new dimensions, creating opportunities for students to personalize their learning effectively. Even with these improvements in AI technologies, there are many concerns about how higher education students would cope with the uncertainties that come with learning with AI. This bibliometric study aims to examine the research patterns on how AI affects students' anxiety in higher education worldwide. The study utilized VOSviewer to analyze data extracted from the Scopus database for the years 2020-2024, determining the performance, co-citation, and co-occurrence of studies. The results show a sharp increase in interest in the topic since 2020, with China, the US, and the UK charting the most contributions. Four main themes were identified: changing how teachers teach with AI, ensuring everyone feels included, addressing mental health, and utilizing smart technology ethically. The combination of education, psychology, and technology indicates how the research focus has changed over time. The results indicate that AI not only helps people generate new ideas but also causes mental stress for its users. The findings indicate that while AI supports idea generation and personalized learning, it also contributes to heightened psychological strain among students. By integrating educational, psychological, and technological perspectives, this study advances a theory-informed understanding of AI-related student anxiety and supports Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) by advocating responsible, emotionally aware, and ethically grounded AI use in higher education.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.3.38

References

Abbad, M. M., Morris, D., & De Nahlik, C. (2009). Looking under the bonnet: Factors affecting student adoption of e-learning systems in Jordan. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i2.596

Abramski, K., Citraro, S., Lombardi, L., Rossetti, G., & Stella, M. (2023). Cognitive network science reveals bias in gpt-3, gpt-3.5 turbo, and gpt-4 mirroring math anxiety in high-school students. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(3), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7030124

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self?efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x

Aldosari, S. A. M. (2020). The future of higher education in the light of artificial intelligence transformations. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 145-151. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p145

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R. E., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 2023(1), 4253331. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Altmäe, S., Sola-Leyva, A., & Salumets, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe? Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 47(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009

Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 35(3), 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w

Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Yu, S., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2020). I, Chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users’ satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents. Telematics and Informatics, 54, 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101473

Avella, J. T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S. G., & Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2), 13-29. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1105911.pdf

Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2019). Adding communicative and affective strategies to an embodied conversational agent to enhance second language learners’ willingness to communicate. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(1), 29-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0171-6

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Balakrishnan, J., Abed, S. S., & Jones, P. (2022). The role of meta-UTAUT factors, perceived anthropomorphism, perceived intelligence, and social self-efficacy in chatbot-based services? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121692

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175

Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x

Bo, Z., Pek, L. S., Cong, W., Tiannan, L., Krishnasamy, H. N., Ne’matullah, K. F., & Arar, H. (2025). Transforming translation education: A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence’s role in fostering sustainable development. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 166-190. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.9

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burkhard, M. (2022). Student Perceptions of AI-Powered Writing Tools: Towards Individualized Teaching Strategies. In 19th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2022) (pp. 73-81). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED626893.pdf

Cacho, R. M. (2024). Integrating Generative AI in University Teaching and Learning: A Model for Balanced Guidelines. Online Learning, 28(3), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4508

Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 18(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799

Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89-101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032858

Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: The ChatGPT effect (p. 287). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003459026

Chanpradit, T. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education: A systematic review. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(4), 889-906. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i4.6128

Chen, J., Yuan, D., Dong, R., Cai, J., Ai, Z., & Zhou, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence significantly facilitates development in the mental health of college students: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1375294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375294

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://tinyurl.com/yc8h62m9

Chiu, T. K., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145568

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper:“So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025). The influence of generative artificial intelligence on creative cognition of design students: a chain mediation model of self-efficacy and anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1455015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455015

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kavitha, K., Joshith, V. P., & Rajeev, N. P. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric approach. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 1121-1137. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1121

Li, H., & Balinas, E. S. (2025). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on university information literacy education: A systematic review from challenges to changes. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, 14(2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.51583/ijltemas.2025.1402004

Li, L. (2025). The psychological impact of generative AI on L2 graduate students’ research writing: a mixed-methods investigation. Advances in Humanities Research,12(1),86-89. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/2025.22907

Mee, R. W. M., Yob, F. S. C., Pek, L. S., Abd Rauf, M. F., Mingmei, Y., & Derahvasht, A. (2025). Building digital thinkers: A bibliometric analysis of computational thinking in children’s education for a sustainable future. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(3), ep581. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16309

Pillai, R., & Sivathanu, B. (2020). Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(10), 3199-3226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2020-0259

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342-363. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2025102700003092061569891

Sallam, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Almutairi, Y. M., Alaqeel, O., Abu Salami, A., Almutairi, Z. E., ... & Barakat, M. (2024). Anxiety among medical students regarding generative artificial intelligence models: a pilot descriptive study. International Medical Education, 3(4), 406-425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime3040031

Sardi, J., Candra, O., Yuliana, D. F., Yanto, D. T. P., & Eliza, F. (2025). How Generative AI Influences Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 15(1), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v15i1.53379

Šijan, A., Ili?, L., Predi?, B., Viduka, D., & Ran?i?, D. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education using Web of Science Database. Facta Universitatis, Series: Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, 119-130. https://doi.org/10.22190/futlte241104011s

Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2021). My chatbot companion-a study of human-chatbot relationships. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 149, 102601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102601

Suhaili, S. M., Salim, N., & Jambli, M. N. (2021). Service chatbots: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, 184, 115461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115461

Suprobo, W., & Basuki, S. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review: Impact of Generative AI as Technology to Learning in Higher Education. Khazanah Informatika: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika, 10(2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.23917/khif.v10i2.3056

Tiannan, L., Pek, L. S., Cong, W., & Bo, Z. (2025). Brushstrokes by Bytes: A Bibliometric Exploration of AI Influence on Art Pedagogy. TEM Journal, 14(3), 2689-2700. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM143-70

Tzirides, A. O., Saini, A., Zapata, G., Searsmith, D., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., ... & Kastania, N. P. (2023). Generative AI: Implications and applications for education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07605. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2305.07605

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Wider, W., Jiang, L., Lin, J., Fauzi, M. A., Li, J., & Chan, C. K. (2024). Metaverse chronicles: a bibliometric analysis of its evolving landscape. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(17), 4873-4886. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227825

Wu, F., Dang, Y., & Li, M. (2025). A Systematic Review of Responses, Attitudes, and Utilization Behaviors on Generative AI for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15040467

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Pek, L. S., Yob, F. S. C. ., Jayaraman, S., Idris, N. I., Rahayu, P. ., & Waluyo, B. . (2026). Balancing Intelligence and Emotion: Mapping Global Research on Artificial Intelligence and Student Anxiety in Higher Education (2020-2024). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(3), 874–894. Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2776

Issue

Section

Articles