Multimodal Design or Communicative Input? ESL Learner Perceptions of TikTok-Inspired Vocabulary Instruction
Keywords:
ESL vocabulary instruction; learner perception; multimodal design; short-form video; TikTok-inspired learning; quantitative surveyAbstract
Short-form video applications such as TikTok offer instructional environments that combine multimodal design with communicative input modes, yet how ESL learners perceive these features in formal classroom contexts remains underexplored. This quantitative descriptive correlational survey study examined the perceptions of 92 ESL learners regarding seven multimodal feature constructs embedded in TikTok-inspired vocabulary instruction. The constructs were derived from a prior qualitative multimodal discourse analysis of 10 authentic TikTok vocabulary videos (Phase 1 of the broader research programme), which informed the design of a validated questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha = .840 to .920) administered within an Intensive English Programme at a private university in Malaysia. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 31. All seven constructs were positively endorsed above the scale midpoint. However, two descriptive patterns emerged. Constructs related to the stabilisation of vocabulary meaning through on-screen text, visual support, and consistent video format received stronger and more consistent endorsement. In contrast, constructs associated with communicative input delivery (narrative framing, audio delivery, embodied cues, and interactive engagement) were endorsed positively, however, with greater individual variability. These patterns informed a tentative exploratory framework distinguishing Design Features from Multimodal Input, offered here as a hypothesis-generating rather than a confirmed framework. Structural validation has been undertaken in a subsequent phase of the research programme using a sample of n = 304 appropriate for structural equation modelling, and is reported separately. The findings provide evidence-based guidance for educators selecting and sequencing TikTok-inspired vocabulary materials, consistent with United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.7.29
References
Abas, I. H., Krishnamurthi, N., Rasli, A., & Gusteti, M. U. (2025). A Delphi study on factors influencing school students' adoption of social media as a learning platform in Malaysia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(3), 1743–1751. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i3.32939
Adiyono, A., Al Matari, A. S., Patimah, L., & Nurdiyansyah, A. A. (2025). Can AI-optimized YouTube videos enhance Islamic religious education? A quantitative study on student learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 22(1), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i1.11100
Alshreef, N. R., & Khadawardi, H. A. (2023). Using TikTok as a tool for English vocabulary learning in the EFL context. English Language Teaching, 16(10), 125. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n10p125
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Cunningham, S., Moor, P., & Redston, C. (2013). Cutting edge intermediate (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duan, H., Yunus, M. M., & Ismail, H. H. (2026). Mobile-assisted English vocabulary learning: A systematic review of platforms, learning outcomes, and implications (2019-2025). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(2), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.2.4
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
Godwin-Jones, R (2000). Literacies and technology tools/trends. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25094
Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students' digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.138
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O'Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.
Jiang, L., & Hafner, C. A. (2024). Digital multimodal composing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 57(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000107
Jumaat, N. A. F., Shanthi, A., Suppiah, P. C., Johar, E. M., & Arumugam, N. (2025). TikTok for education: Implications for language learning in a second language context. Asian Journal of University Education, 21(3), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v21i3.50
Khlaif, Z. N., & Salha, S. (2021). Using TikTok in education: A form of micro-learning or nano-learning? Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 12(3), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2021.90211.1087
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners' engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning, 23(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
Li, Y., & Hafner, C. A. (2022). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: Investigating receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. ReCALL, 34(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000161
Lim, F. V. (2021). Designing learning with embodied teaching: Perspectives from multimodality. Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Open University Press.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Punkhoom, W., Sutthisan, S., Suksawas, W., Raksasat, N., & Jehma, H. (2025). TikTok-enhanced language learning: Evaluating short-form video content impacts on Thai EFL students' vocabulary growth. rEFLections, 32(3), 1768–1792.
Raman, K., Hashim, H., & Ismail, H. H. (2023). Enhancing English verbal communication skills through virtual reality: A study on engagement, motivation, and autonomy among English as a second language learners. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(12), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.12
Rasyid, F., Hanjariyah, H., & Aini, N. (2023). TikTok as a source of English language content: Perceived impacts on students' competence: Views from Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(10), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.10.19
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shamshul, I. S. M., Ismail, H. H., & Nordin, N. M. (2024). Using digital technologies in teaching and learning of literature in ESL classrooms: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.10
Shanthi, A., Jumaat, N. A. F., Suppiah, P. C., Johar, E. M., & Arumugam, N. (2024). From trending to teaching: A framework to analyse TikTok videos for vocabulary instruction. International Journal of Social Science Research, 12(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v12i2.21904
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Tan, K. H., Rajendran, A., Muslim, N., Alias, J., & Yusof, N. A. (2022). The potential of TikTok's key features as a pedagogical strategy for ESL classrooms. Sustainability, 14(24), Article 16876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416876
Thanga Rajan, S., & Ismail, H. H. (2022). TikTok use as strategy to improve knowledge acquisition and build engagement to learn literature in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(11), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.3
Teng, M. F. (2023). Incidental vocabulary learning from captioned videos: Learners' prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12756
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S. (2015). How does prior word knowledge affect vocabulary learning progress in an extensive reading program? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000606
Yang, H. (2020). Secondary-school students' perspectives of utilizing TikTok for English learning in and beyond the EFL classroom. In Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Education Technology and Social Science (ETSS 2020) (pp. 162–183). Clausius Scientific Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jane Xavierine, Norshima binti Zainal Shah, Alice Shanthi, Khayrullayeva Nodira Nematilloyevna, Raziya Seydabullaeva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
