Learning Design Architecture of Visual Feedback and Gamified Design in Secondary Mathematics: Effects on Student Learning and Performance
Keywords:
Cognitive Load Theory; digital learning environments; gamification; secondary mathematics; visual feedbackAbstract
Digital learning platforms in secondary mathematics frequently employ visual cues such as correctness icons, hints, and progress bars to guide student thinking and motivation. These elements constitute a learning architecture that influences how students process information and solve mathematical problems. Despite the widespread use of visual feedback and gamified features in digital mathematics tools, research remains fragmented and lacks a theory-guided synthesis focused specifically on secondary mathematics, particularly concerning cognitive demands. This study presents a systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020, to investigate how visual feedback and gamified design impact motivation, cognitive engagement, and problem-solving in secondary mathematics environments. Three academic databases (ERIC, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink) were searched for studies published between 2018 and 2025. Studies were screened based on a mathematics focus, secondary school level, and the utilisation of visual or gamified feedback in digital settings. A total of 32 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed through a narrative, theory-guided synthesis informed by Cognitive Load Theory. The findings reveal that layered hints, immediate correctness signals, and clear progress indicators facilitate mathematical reasoning by reducing extraneous cognitive load, while high-salience competitive prompts may increase distraction during multi-step tasks. Based on these findings, the review proposes a visual-feedback design framework grounded in Cognitive Load Theory, which elucidates how digital design choices shape learning processes in secondary mathematics. Practical implications are outlined for teachers, instructional designers, and researchers aiming to create visually efficient and student-supportive learning environments.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.2.16
References
Alkan, S., & Korkmaz, E. (2021). Analysis of digital games related to mathematics education with deconstructing. World Journal of Education, 11(2), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v11n2p46
Aydin, M., Karal, H., & Nabiyev, V. (2023). Examination of adaptation components in serious games: A systematic review study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6541-6562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11462-1
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., Gonda, D. E., Huang, B., & Liang, X. (2022). Incorporating fantasy into gamification promotes student learning and quality of online interaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00335-9
Balci, S., Secaur, J. M., & Morris, B. J. (2022). Comparing the effectiveness of badges and leaderboards on academic performance and motivation of students in fully versus partially gamified online physics classes. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6365-6382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10983-z
Bryant, A. (2024). Student perceptions of engagement with secondary mathematics in a gamified, standards-based grading system: A basic qualitative study (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Celasun, Z. G., & Kaya, S. Ü. (2025). Gamification in education: Unlocking engagement and enhancing learning outcomes. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 24(1), 59-63.
Chen, C., Jamiat, N., Abdul Rabu, S. N., & Mao, Y. (2024). Effects of a self-regulated-based gamified interactive e-book on primary students' learning performance and affection in a flipped mathematics classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), Article 12789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12789-7
Cosentino, G., Anton, J., Sharma, K., Gelsomini, M., Giannakos, M., & Abrahamson, D. (2025). Generative AI and multimodal data for educational feedback: Insights from embodied math learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1686-1709. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13587
Denden, M., Tlili, A., Salha, S., & Abed, M. (2024). Opening up the gamification black box: Effects of students' personality traits and perception of game elements on their engaged behaviours in a gamified course. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 921-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09701-6
Demedts, F., Said-Metwaly, S., Kiili, K., Ninaus, M., Lindstedt, A., Reynvoet, B., Sasanguie, D., & Depaepe, F. (2025). Adaptive feedback in digital educational games: An explanatory item response theory approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(5), Article e70104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70104
Edusei, K. (2022). Integrating game mechanics and math content in math game design. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Ekici, M. (2021). A systematic review of the use of gamification in flipped learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3327-3346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10394-y
Fanfarelli, J. R. (2020). Impact of narrative and badging on learning and engagement in a psychology learning game. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 480-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12838
Holguin-Alvarez, J., Cruz-Montero, J., Ruiz-Salazar, J., Atoche Wong, R. L., & Merino-Flores, I. (2025). Effects of feedback dynamics and mixed gamification on cognitive underachievement in school. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), Article ep551. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15717
Hirschi, K., Kang, O., Yang, M., Hansen, J. H. L., & Beloin, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence-generated feedback for second language intelligibility: An exploratory intervention study on effects and perceptions. Language Learning, 75(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12719
Jost, P., Rangger, S., & Künz, A. (2023). Tap or swipe: Interaction's impact on cognitive load and rewards in a mobile mental math game. International Association for Development of the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2023_202306L019
Kingsley, T., & Grabner-Hagen, M. M. (2023). It's a winning condition! Examining the impact of meaningful gamification with preservice teachers. College Teaching, 71(4), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.2019665
Luarn, P., Chen, C.-C., & Chiu, Y.-P. (2023). The influence of gamification elements in educational environments. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 13(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.323446
Luo, Z. (2023). Determinants of the perceived usefulness (PU) in the context of using gamification for classroom-based ESL teaching: A scale development study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4741-4768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11409-6
Mahat, J., Alias, N., & Yusop, F. D. (2023). Systematic literature review on gamified professional training among employees. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6747-6767. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2043910
Maryono, D., Akhyar, M., Wicaksono, B. T., & Pradana Taufik Prakisya, N. (2025). NgodingSeru.com: An adaptive e-learning system with gamification to enhance programming problem-solving skills for vocational high school students. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00581-9
Meng, C., Zhao, M., Pan, Z., Pan, Q., & Bonk, C. J. (2024). Investigating the impact of gamification components on online learners' engagement. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00336-3
Mimouni, A. (2022, November). Using mobile gamified quizzing for active learning: The effect of reflective class feedback on undergraduates' achievement. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12003-12026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11097-2
Muchuweni, T., Jojo, Z., & Kariyana, I. (2025). Enhancing mathematics instruction through Quizizz: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(10), 106-124. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.10.5
Nguyen, V. T. T., Chen, H.-L., & Nguyen, V. T. K. (2025). Integrating social-emotional learning into gamified flipped classrooms: Impacts on emotion regulation, achievement, and communication tendency. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13109
Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Essentials of educational psychology. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Ortiz-Rojas, M., Chiluiza, K., Valcke, M., & Bolanos-Mendoza, C. (2025). How gamification boosts learning in STEM higher education: A mixed methods study. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), Article 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00521-3
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., & Moher, D. (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2020). Cognitive-load theory: Methods to manage working-memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183
Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G.-J., Intarakamhang, U., Srisawasdi, N., & Chaipidech, P. (2024). Effects of a personalized game on students' outcomes and visual attention during digital citizenship learning. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2351275. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2351275
Reiter, M. (2025). Gamification in education: Effectiveness and impact on student motivation. Acta Educationis Generalis, 15(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2025-0013
Saleem, A. N., Noori, N. M., & Ozdamli, F. (2022). Gamification applications in e-learning: A literature review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 465-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09487-x
Slamet, T., Brush, T., & Kwon, K. (2025). The effects of competition in gamified online discussions on learners' behavioural and cognitive engagement. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09740-7
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.). (2016). APA college dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14944-000
Wang, Z., Harun, J., & Yuan, Y. (2024). Enhancing reading instruction through gamification: A systematic review of theoretical models, implementation strategies, and measurable outcomes (2020-2024). Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, 28. https://doi.org/10.28945/5394
Yang, Q.-F., Lian, L.-W., & Zhao, J.-H. (2023). Developing a gamified artificial intelligence educational robot to promote learning effectiveness and behaviour in laboratory safety courses for undergraduate students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00391-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tirivanhu Muchuweni, Zingiswa Jojo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
